Total
450 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-59849 | 2 Hcltech, Hcltechsw | 3 Bigfix Remote Control, Hcl Devops Deploy, Hcl Launch | 2026-01-06 | 4.7 Medium |
| Improper management of Content Security Policy in HCL BigFix Remote Control Lite Web Portal (versions 10.1.0.0326 and lower) may allow the execution of malicious code in web pages. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31142 | 2 Fedoraproject, Xen | 2 Fedora, Xen | 2026-01-05 | 7.5 High |
| Because of a logical error in XSA-407 (Branch Type Confusion), the mitigation is not applied properly when it is intended to be used. XSA-434 (Speculative Return Stack Overflow) uses the same infrastructure, so is equally impacted. For more details, see: https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-407.html https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-434.html | ||||
| CVE-2025-68668 | 1 N8n | 1 N8n | 2026-01-05 | 9.9 Critical |
| n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables. | ||||
| CVE-2025-65318 | 2 Canarymail, Microsoft | 2 Canary Mail, Windows | 2025-12-31 | 9.1 Critical |
| When using the attachment interaction functionality, Canary Mail 5.1.40 and below saves documents to a file system without a Mark-of-the-Web tag, which allows attackers to bypass the built-in file protection mechanisms of both Windows OS and third-party software. | ||||
| CVE-2025-65319 | 1 Blixhq | 1 Bluemail | 2025-12-31 | 9.1 Critical |
| When using the attachment interaction functionality, Blue Mail 1.140.103 and below saves documents to a file system without a Mark-of-the-Web tag, which allows attackers to bypass the built-in file protection mechanisms of both Windows OS and third-party software. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13326 | 1 Mattermost | 2 Mattermost, Mattermost Desktop | 2025-12-18 | 3.9 Low |
| Mattermost Desktop App versions <6.0.0 fail to enable the Hardened Runtime on the Mattermost Desktop App when packaged for Mac App Store which allows an attacker to inherit TCC permissions via copying the binary to a tmp folder. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30052 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Visual Studio 2017, Visual Studio 2019, Visual Studio 2022 | 2025-12-17 | 4.7 Medium |
| Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-34984 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2025-12-16 | 7.1 High |
| A protection mechanism failure in Fortinet FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, 6.4.0 through 6.4.3, 6.3.6 through 6.3.23 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3453 | 1 Lenovo | 42 730s-13iml, 730s-13iml Firmware, Ideacentre Aio 5-24imb05 and 39 more | 2025-12-16 | 6.8 Medium |
| Some Lenovo Notebook, ThinkPad, and Lenovo Desktop systems have BIOS modules unprotected by Intel Boot Guard that could allow an attacker with physical access the ability to write to the SPI flash storage. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66204 | 1 Wbce | 1 Wbce Cms | 2025-12-11 | 8.1 High |
| WBCE CMS is a content management system. Version 1.6.4 contains a brute-force protection bypass where an attacker can indefinitely reset the counter by modifying `X-Forwarded-For` on each request, gaining unlimited password guessing attempts, effectively bypassing all brute-force protection. The application fully trusts the `X-Forwarded-For` header without validating it or restricting its usage. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.5. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38092 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Cyclecloud | 2025-12-09 | 8.8 High |
| Azure CycleCloud Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-64763 | 1 Envoyproxy | 1 Envoy | 2025-12-05 | 3.7 Low |
| Envoy is a high-performance edge/middle/service proxy. In 1.33.12, 1.34.10, 1.35.6, 1.36.2, and earlier, when Envoy is configured in TCP proxy mode to handle CONNECT requests, it accepts client data before issuing a 2xx response and forwards that data to the upstream TCP connection. If a forwarding proxy upstream from Envoy then responds with a non-2xx status, this can cause a de-synchronized CONNECT tunnel state. By default Envoy continues to allow early CONNECT data to avoid disrupting existing deployments. The envoy.reloadable_features.reject_early_connect_data runtime flag can be set to reject CONNECT requests that send data before a 2xx response when intermediaries upstream from Envoy may reject establishment of a CONNECT tunnel. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46553 | 1 Misskey | 1 Summaly | 2025-12-01 | 6.1 Medium |
| @misskey-dev/summaly is a tool for getting a summary of a web page. Starting in version 3.0.1 and prior to version 5.2.1, a logic error in the main `summaly` function causes the `allowRedirects` option to never be passed to any plugins, and as a result, isn't enforced. Misskey will follow redirects, despite explicitly requesting not to. Version 5.2.1 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24834 | 1 Intel | 2 Cip Software, Computing Improvement Program | 2025-11-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an information disclosure. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via adjacent access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12906 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2025-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 140.0.7339.80 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2025-12909 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2025-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Devtools in Google Chrome prior to 140.0.7339.80 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via Devtools. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2023-5557 | 2 Gnome, Redhat | 6 Tracker Miners, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 3 more | 2025-11-20 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the tracker-miners package. A weakness in the sandbox allows a maliciously-crafted file to execute code outside the sandbox if the tracker-extract process has first been compromised by a separate vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10157 | 1 Mmaitre314 | 1 Picklescan | 2025-11-13 | 7.8 High |
| A Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability in mmaitre314 picklescan versions up to and including 0.0.30 allows a remote attacker to bypass the unsafe globals check. This is possible because the scanner performs an exact match for module names, allowing malicious payloads to be loaded via submodules of dangerous packages (e.g., 'asyncio.unix_events' instead of 'asyncio'). When the incorrectly considered safe file is loaded after scan, it can lead to the execution of malicious code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12554 | 2 Azure-access, Azure Access Technology | 6 Blu-ic2, Blu-ic2 Firmware, Blu-ic4 and 3 more | 2025-11-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Missing Security Headers.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20923 | 1 Oracle | 3 Graalvm, Jdk, Jre | 2025-11-04 | 3.1 Low |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: JavaFX). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u391; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.12 and 21.3.8. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.1 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||