Total
9407 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-37251 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPENGINE, INC. Advanced Custom Fields PRO.This issue affects Advanced Custom Fields PRO: from n/a before 6.3.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12557 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Transporters.io plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38345 | 1 Solaplugins | 1 Sola Testimonials | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Sola Testimonials versions prior to 3.0.0. If this vulnerability is exploited, an attacker allows a user who logs in to the WordPress site where the affected plugin is enabled to access a malicious page. As a result, the user may perform unintended operations on the WordPress site. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55500 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Avenwu Whistle v.2.9.90 and before allows attackers to perform malicious API calls, resulting in the execution of arbitrary code on the victim's machine. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45161 | 1 Blu-castle | 1 Bcum221e | 2026-04-15 | 4.6 Medium |
| A CSRF issue was discovered in the administrative web GUI in Blu-Castle BCUM221E 1.0.0P220507. This can be exploited via a URL, an image load, an XMLHttpRequest, etc. and can result in exposure of data or unintended code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12541 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Chative Live chat and Chatbot plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the add_chative_widget_action() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the channel ID or organization ID via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This could lead to redirecting the live chat widget to an attacker-controlled channel. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53540 | 1 Espressif | 1 Arduino-esp32 | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| arduino-esp32 is an Arduino core for the ESP32, ESP32-S2, ESP32-S3, ESP32-C3, ESP32-C6 and ESP32-H2 microcontrollers. Several OTA update examples and the HTTPUpdateServer implementation are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The update endpoints accept POST requests for firmware uploads without CSRF protection. This allows an attacker to upload and execute arbitrary firmware, resulting in remote code execution (RCE). This vulnerability is fixed in 3.2.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23081 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - DataTransfer Extension allows Cross Site Request Forgery, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Mediawiki - DataTransfer Extension: from 1.39.X before 1.39.11, from 1.41.X before 1.41.3, from 1.42.X before 1.42.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12004 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The WPC Order Notes for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_update_order_note() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37145 | 1 Hrsale | 1 Hrsale | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| HRSALE 1.1.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to add unauthorized administrative users through the employee registration form. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML page with hidden form fields to trick authenticated administrators into creating new user accounts with elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52212 | 2 Automattic, Wordpress | 2 Wp Job Manager, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Automattic WP Job Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Job Manager: from n/a through 2.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47722 | 1 Zucchetti | 1 Axess Cloki Access Control | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low |
| Zucchetti Axess CLOKI Access Control 1.64 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate access control settings without user interaction. Attackers can craft malicious web pages with hidden forms to disable or modify access control parameters by tricking authenticated users into loading the page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14266 | 1 Ercom | 1 Cryptobox | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| CSRF in Ercom Cryptobox administration console allows attacker to trigger some actions on behalf of a Cryptobox administrator. The attack requires the administrator to browse a malicious web site or to click a link while he has an open session on the administration console. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28141 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| The web application is not protected against cross-site request forgery attacks. Therefore, an attacker can trick users into performing actions on the application when they visit an attacker-controlled website or click on a malicious link. E.g. an attacker can forge malicious links to reset the admin password or create new users. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9661 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WP All Import Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.7. This is due to missing nonce validation on the delete_and_edit function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete imported content (posts, comments, users, etc.) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47820 | 1 Ubeeinteractive | 1 Ubee Evw327 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Ubee EVW327 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to enable remote access without user interaction. Attackers can craft a malicious webpage that automatically submits a form to change router remote access settings to port 8080 without the user's consent. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10095 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| Various Lexmark devices have CSRF that allows an attacker to modify the configuration of the device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24358 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| gorilla/csrf provides Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) prevention middleware for Go web applications & services. Prior to 1.7.2, gorilla/csrf does not validate the Origin header against an allowlist. Its executes its validation of the Referer header for cross-origin requests only when it believes the request is being served over TLS. It determines this by inspecting the r.URL.Scheme value. However, this value is never populated for "server" requests per the Go spec, and so this check does not run in practice. This vulnerability allows an attacker who has gained XSS on a subdomain or top level domain to perform authenticated form submissions against gorilla/csrf protected targets that share the same top level domain. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.7.2. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36906 | 1 P5 | 2 Fnip-4xsh, Fnip-8x16a | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| P5 FNIP-8x16A FNIP-4xSH 1.0.20 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to add new admin users, change passwords, and modify system configurations by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted form. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36918 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| iDS6 DSSPro Digital Signage System 6.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to trick logged-in administrators into adding unauthorized users by exploiting the lack of CSRF protections. | ||||