Total
750 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-8157 | 1 Huawei | 4 Oceanstor 5800 V3, Oceanstor 5800 V3 Firmware, Oceanstor 6900 V3 and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| OceanStor 5800 V3 with software V300R002C00 and V300R002C10, OceanStor 6900 V3 V300R001C00 has an information leakage vulnerability. Products use TLS1.0 to encrypt. Attackers can exploit TLS1.0's vulnerabilities to decrypt data to obtain sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9466 | 1 Tp-link | 2 Wr841n V8, Wr841n V8 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The executable httpd on the TP-Link WR841N V8 router before TL-WR841N(UN)_V8_170210 contained a design flaw in the use of DES for block encryption. This resulted in incorrect access control, which allowed attackers to gain read-write access to system settings through the protected router configuration service tddp via the LAN and Ath0 (Wi-Fi) interfaces. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9243 | 3 Canonical, Cryptography.io, Fedoraproject | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Cryptography, Fedora | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| HKDF in cryptography before 1.5.2 returns an empty byte-string if used with a length less than algorithm.digest_size. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15998 | 1 Nq | 1 Contacts Backup \& Restore | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In the "NQ Contacts Backup & Restore" application 1.1 for Android, DES encryption with a static key is used to secure transmitted contact data. This makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext information by sniffing the network. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15997 | 1 Nq | 1 Contacts Backup \& Restore | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In the "NQ Contacts Backup & Restore" application 1.1 for Android, RC4 encryption is used to secure the user password locally stored in shared preferences. Because there is a static RC4 key, an attacker can gain access to user credentials more easily by leveraging access to the preferences XML file. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8234 | 1 Openstack | 1 Glance | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The image signature algorithm in OpenStack Glance 11.0.0 allows remote attackers to bypass the signature verification process via a crafted image, which triggers an MD5 collision. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5243 | 1 Rapid7 | 1 Nexpose | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The default SSH configuration in Rapid7 Nexpose hardware appliances shipped before June 2017 does not specify desired algorithms for key exchange and other important functions. As a result, it falls back to allowing ALL algorithms supported by the relevant version of OpenSSH and makes the installations vulnerable to a range of MITM, downgrade, and decryption attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8370 | 1 Mitsubishielectric | 6 Qj71e71-100, Qj71e71-100 Firmware, Qj71e71-b2 and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Mitsubishi Electric Automation MELSEC-Q series Ethernet interface modules QJ71E71-100, all versions, QJ71E71-B5, all versions, and QJ71E71-B2, all versions. Weakly encrypted passwords are transmitted to a MELSEC-Q PLC. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10668 | 1 Xoev | 1 Osci Transport Library | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Padding Oracle exists in OSCI-Transport 1.2 as used in OSCI Transport Library 1.6.1 (Java) and OSCI Transport Library 1.6 (.NET). Under an MITM condition within the OSCI infrastructure, an attacker needs to send crafted protocol messages to analyse the CBC mode padding in order to decrypt the transport encryption. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3539 | 3 Debian, Oracle, Redhat | 15 Debian Linux, Jdk, Jre and 12 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Security). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u141, 7u131 and 8u121; Java SE Embedded: 8u121. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Java SE, Java SE Embedded accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.0 Base Score 3.1 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2016-6485 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento2 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The __construct function in Framework/Encryption/Crypt.php in Magento 2 uses the PHP rand function to generate a random number for the initialization vector, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by guessing the value. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3099 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Hpc Node and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| mod_ns in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop 7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node 7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation 7 allows remote attackers to force the use of ciphers that were not intended to be enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4917 | 1 Vmware | 1 Vsphere Data Protection | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| VMware vSphere Data Protection (VDP) 6.1.x, 6.0.x, 5.8.x, and 5.5.x locally stores vCenter Server credentials using reversible encryption. This issue may allow plaintext credentials to be obtained. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11133 | 1 Stashcat | 1 Heinekingmedia | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in heinekingmedia StashCat through 1.7.5 for Android, through 0.0.80w for Web, and through 0.0.86 for Desktop. To encrypt messages, AES in CBC mode is used with a pseudo-random secret. This secret and the IV are generated with math.random() in previous versions and with CryptoJS.lib.WordArray.random() in newer versions, which uses math.random() internally. This is not cryptographically strong. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8191 | 1 Huawei | 1 Fusionsphere Openstack | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| FusionSphere OpenStack V100R006C00SPC102(NFV)has a week cryptographic algorithm vulnerability. Attackers may exploit the vulnerability to crack the cipher text and cause information leak on the transmission links. | ||||
| CVE-2021-46900 | 1 Sympa | 1 Sympa | 2025-04-17 | 7.5 High |
| Sympa before 6.2.62 relies on a cookie parameter for certain security objectives, but does not ensure that this parameter exists and has an unpredictable value. Specifically, the cookie parameter is both a salt for stored passwords and an XSS protection mechanism. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33846 | 1 Fresenius-kabi | 8 Agilia Connect, Agilia Connect Firmware, Agilia Partner Maintenance Software and 5 more | 2025-04-16 | 5.9 Medium |
| Fresenius Kabi Vigilant Software Suite (Mastermed Dashboard) version 2.0.1.3 issues authentication tokens to authenticated users that are signed with a symmetric encryption key. An attacker in possession of the key can issue valid JWTs and impersonate arbitrary users. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33018 | 1 Philips | 4 Myvue, Speech, Vue Motion and 1 more | 2025-04-16 | 7.5 High |
| The use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm in Philips Vue PACS versions 12.2.x.x and prior is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31562 | 1 Fresenius-kabi | 8 Agilia Connect, Agilia Connect Firmware, Agilia Link\+ and 5 more | 2025-04-16 | 6.5 Medium |
| The SSL/TLS configuration of Fresenius Kabi Agilia Link + version 3.0 has serious deficiencies that may allow an attacker to compromise SSL/TLS sessions in different ways. An attacker may be able to eavesdrop on transferred data, manipulate data allegedly secured by SSL/TLS, and impersonate an entity to gain access to sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2021-41835 | 1 Fresenius-kabi | 7 Agilia Connect, Agilia Partner Maintenance Software, Link\+ Agilia and 4 more | 2025-04-16 | 7.3 High |
| Fresenius Kabi Agilia Link + version 3.0 does not enforce transport layer encryption. Therefore, transmitted data may be sent in cleartext. Transport layer encryption is offered on Port TCP/443, but the affected service does not perform an automated redirect from the unencrypted service on Port TCP/80 to the encrypted service. | ||||