Total
9179 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-32625 | 1 Sakura | 1 Ts Webfonts For Sakura | 2026-03-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TS Webfonts for SAKURA 3.1.2 and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a user and to change settings by having a user view a malicious page. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5455 | 3 Fedoraproject, Freeipa, Redhat | 25 Fedora, Freeipa, Codeready Linux Builder and 22 more | 2026-03-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25186 | 1 Tina4 | 1 Tina4 Stack | 2026-03-16 | 5.3 Medium |
| Tina4 Stack 1.0.3 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify admin user credentials by submitting forged POST requests to the profile endpoint. Attackers can craft HTML forms targeting the /kim/profile endpoint with hidden fields containing malicious user data like passwords and email addresses to update administrator accounts without authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25190 | 2 Rul10, Sourceforge | 2 Easyndexer, Easyndexer | 2026-03-16 | 5.3 Medium |
| Easyndexer 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to create administrative accounts by submitting forged POST requests. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that submit POST requests to createuser.php with parameters including username, password, name, surname, and privileges set to 1 for administrator access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39744 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 5 Aix, Sterling Connect\, Sterling Connect Direct Web Services and 2 more | 2026-03-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | ||||
| CVE-2023-36517 | 1 Kevonadonis | 1 Wp Abstracts | 2026-03-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kevon Adonis WP Abstracts plugin <= 2.6.2 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2307 | 1 Qwik | 1 Qwik | 2026-03-13 | 4.7 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository builderio/qwik prior to 0.104.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64166 | 2 Mercurius-js, Mercurius Project | 2 Mercurius, Mercurius | 2026-03-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| Mercurius is a GraphQL adapter for Fastify. Prior to version 16.4.0, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The issue arises from incorrect parsing of the Content-Type header in requests. Specifically, requests with Content-Type values such as application/x-www-form-urlencoded, multipart/form-data, or text/plain could be misinterpreted as application/json. This misinterpretation bypasses the preflight checks performed by the fetch() API, potentially allowing unauthorized actions to be performed on behalf of an authenticated user. This issue has been patched in version 16.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2021-35486 | 1 Nokia | 2 Impact, Impact Mobile | 2026-03-13 | 8.1 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nokia IMPACT through 19.11.2.10-20210118042150283 allows a remote attacker to import and overwrite the entire application configuration. Specifically, in /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import, neither the X-CSRF-NONCE HTTP header nor the CSRF-NONCE cookie is validated. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25200 | 2 Tomalofficial, Zsoft | 2 Php Oop Cms Blog, Oop Cms Blog | 2026-03-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| OOP CMS BLOG 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to create administrative user accounts by crafting malicious POST requests. Attackers can submit forms to the addUser.php endpoint with parameters including userName, password, email, and role set to administrative privileges to gain unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1085 | 2 Optimizza, Wordpress | 2 True Ranker, Wordpress | 2026-03-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| The True Ranker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.9. This is due to missing nonce validation on the seolocalrank-signout action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disconnect the administrator's True Ranker account via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1087 | 2 Openplatform, Wordpress | 2 The Guardian News Feed, Wordpress | 2026-03-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including the Guardian API key, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59541 | 1 Chamilo | 1 Chamilo Lms | 2026-03-09 | 8.1 High |
| Chamilo is a learning management system. Prior to version 1.11.34, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allows an attacker to delete projects inside a course without the victim’s consent. The issue arises because sensitive actions such as project deletion do not implement anti-CSRF protections (tokens) and GET based requests. As a result, an authenticated user (Trainer) can be tricked into executing this unwanted action by simply visiting a malicious page. This issue has been patched in version 1.11.34. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66595 | 1 Yokogawa | 2 Fast/tools, Fast\/tools | 2026-03-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in FAST/TOOLS provided by Yokogawa Electric Corporation. This product is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). When a user accesses a link crafted by an attacker, the user’s account could be compromised. The affected products and versions are as follows: FAST/TOOLS (Packages: RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB) R9.01 to R10.04 | ||||
| CVE-2023-41654 | 1 Heiglandreas | 1 Authldap | 2026-03-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Andreas Heigl authLdap plugin <= 2.5.8 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36018 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Concert, Linux Kernel | 2026-03-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 2.1.0 for Z hub component is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68481 | 2 Fastapi-users, Fastapi-users Project | 2 Fastapi-users, Fastapi Users | 2026-03-05 | 5.9 Medium |
| FastAPI Users allows users to quickly add a registration and authentication system to their FastAPI project. Prior to version 15.0.2, the OAuth login state tokens are completely stateless and carry no per-request entropy or any data that could link them to the session that initiated the OAuth flow. `generate_state_token()` is always called with an empty `state_data` dict, so the resulting JWT only contains the fixed audience claim plus an expiration timestamp. On callback, the library merely checks that the JWT verifies under `state_secret` and is unexpired; there is no attempt to match the state value to the browser that initiated the OAuth request, no correlation cookie, and no server-side cache. Any attacker can hit `/authorize`, capture the server-generated state, finish the upstream OAuth flow with their own provider account, and then trick a victim into loading `.../callback?code=<attacker_code>&state=<attacker_state>`. Because the state JWT is valid for any client for \~1 hour, the victim’s browser will complete the flow. This leads to login CSRF. Depending on the app’s logic, the login CSRF can lead to an account takeover of the victim account or to the victim user getting logged in to the attacker's account. Version 15.0.2 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25156 | 1 Teradek | 2 Cube, Cube Firmware | 2026-03-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| Teradek Cube 7.3.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change administrative passwords without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to submit password change requests to the device's system configuration interface. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34430 | 2 1panel, Fit2cloud | 2 1panel, 1panel | 2026-03-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| 1Panel versions 1.10.33 through 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the panel name management functionality. The affected endpoint does not implement CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a panel-name change request; if a victim visits the page while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows a remote attacker to change the victim’s panel name to an arbitrary value without consent. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34429 | 2 1panel, Fit2cloud | 2 1panel, 1panel | 2026-03-05 | 7.1 High |
| 1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web port configuration functionality. The port-change endpoint lacks CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a port-change request; when a victim visits it while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows an attacker to change the port on which the 1Panel web service listens, causing loss of access on the original port and resulting in service disruption or denial of service, and may unintentionally expose the service on an attacker-chosen port. | ||||