Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Acm
Subscriptions
Total
199 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-22866 | 1 Redhat | 7 Acm, Apache Camel Hawtio, Ceph Storage and 4 more | 2026-04-15 | 4 Medium |
| Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recovery of the private key when P-256 is used in any well known protocols. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55565 | 1 Redhat | 11 Acm, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 8 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| nanoid (aka Nano ID) before 5.0.9 mishandles non-integer values. 3.3.8 is also a fixed version. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2241 | 1 Redhat | 2 Acm, Multicluster Engine | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in Hive, a component of Multicluster Engine (MCE) and Advanced Cluster Management (ACM). This vulnerability causes VCenter credentials to be exposed in the ClusterProvision object after provisioning a VSphere cluster. Users with read access to ClusterProvision objects can extract sensitive credentials even if they do not have direct access to Kubernetes Secrets. This issue can lead to unauthorized VCenter access, cluster management, and privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45338 | 1 Redhat | 27 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Ceph Storage and 24 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45337 | 1 Redhat | 15 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Cert Manager and 12 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| Applications and libraries which misuse connection.serverAuthenticate (via callback field ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback) may be susceptible to an authorization bypass. The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions. For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key. Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/cry...@v0.31.0 enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth. Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8556 | 1 Redhat | 23 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Ceph Storage and 20 more | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in CIRCL's implementation of the FourQ elliptic curve. This vulnerability allows an attacker to compromise session security via low-order point injection and incorrect point validation during Diffie-Hellman key exchange. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30204 | 1 Redhat | 19 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Cryostat and 16 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| golang-jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Starting in version 3.2.0 and prior to versions 5.2.2 and 4.5.2, the function parse.ParseUnverified splits (via a call to strings.Split) its argument (which is untrusted data) on periods. As a result, in the face of a malicious request whose Authorization header consists of Bearer followed by many period characters, a call to that function incurs allocations to the tune of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument), with a constant factor of about 16. This issue is fixed in 5.2.2 and 4.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45296 | 2 Pillarjs, Redhat | 19 Path-to-regexp, Acm, Ansible Automation Platform and 16 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| path-to-regexp turns path strings into a regular expressions. In certain cases, path-to-regexp will output a regular expression that can be exploited to cause poor performance. Because JavaScript is single threaded and regex matching runs on the main thread, poor performance will block the event loop and lead to a DoS. The bad regular expression is generated any time you have two parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (.). For users of 0.1, upgrade to 0.1.10. All other users should upgrade to 8.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24786 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 24 Go, Acm, Ceph Storage and 21 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| The protojson.Unmarshal function can enter an infinite loop when unmarshaling certain forms of invalid JSON. This condition can occur when unmarshaling into a message which contains a google.protobuf.Any value, or when the UnmarshalOptions.DiscardUnknown option is set. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53259 | 1 Redhat | 2 Acm, Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| quic-go is an implementation of the QUIC protocol in Go. An off-path attacker can inject an ICMP Packet Too Large packet. Since affected quic-go versions used IP_PMTUDISC_DO, the kernel would then return a "message too large" error on sendmsg, i.e. when quic-go attempts to send a packet that exceeds the MTU claimed in that ICMP packet. By setting this value to smaller than 1200 bytes (the minimum MTU for QUIC), the attacker can disrupt a QUIC connection. Crucially, this can be done after completion of the handshake, thereby circumventing any TCP fallback that might be implemented on the application layer (for example, many browsers fall back to HTTP over TCP if they're unable to establish a QUIC connection). The attacker needs to at least know the client's IP and port tuple to mount an attack. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.48.2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24450 | 3 Linuxfoundation, Nats, Redhat | 3 Nats-server, Nats Streaming Server, Acm | 2026-03-30 | 8.8 High |
| NATS nats-server before 2.7.2 has Incorrect Access Control. Any authenticated user can obtain the privileges of the System account by misusing the "dynamically provisioned sandbox accounts" feature. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30633 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 14 Go, Acm, Application Interconnect and 11 more | 2026-03-09 | 7.5 High |
| Uncontrolled recursion in Unmarshal in encoding/xml before Go 1.17.12 and Go 1.18.4 allows an attacker to cause a panic due to stack exhaustion via unmarshalling an XML document into a Go struct which has a nested field that uses the 'any' field tag. | ||||
| CVE-2022-32148 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 19 Go, Acm, Application Interconnect and 16 more | 2026-03-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper exposure of client IP addresses in net/http before Go 1.17.12 and Go 1.18.4 can be triggered by calling httputil.ReverseProxy.ServeHTTP with a Request.Header map containing a nil value for the X-Forwarded-For header, which causes ReverseProxy to set the client IP as the value of the X-Forwarded-For header. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30629 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 15 Go, Acm, Ceph Storage and 12 more | 2026-03-06 | 3.1 Low |
| Non-random values for ticket_age_add in session tickets in crypto/tls before Go 1.17.11 and Go 1.18.3 allow an attacker that can observe TLS handshakes to correlate successive connections by comparing ticket ages during session resumption. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1962 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 16 Go, Acm, Application Interconnect and 13 more | 2026-03-06 | 5.5 Medium |
| Uncontrolled recursion in the Parse functions in go/parser before Go 1.17.12 and Go 1.18.4 allow an attacker to cause a panic due to stack exhaustion via deeply nested types or declarations. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30635 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 15 Go, Acm, Ceph Storage and 12 more | 2026-03-06 | 7.5 High |
| Uncontrolled recursion in Decoder.Decode in encoding/gob before Go 1.17.12 and Go 1.18.4 allows an attacker to cause a panic due to stack exhaustion via a message which contains deeply nested structures. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30630 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 17 Go, Acm, Application Interconnect and 14 more | 2026-03-06 | 7.5 High |
| Uncontrolled recursion in Glob in io/fs before Go 1.17.12 and Go 1.18.4 allows an attacker to cause a panic due to stack exhaustion via a path which contains a large number of path separators. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1705 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 22 Go, Acm, Application Interconnect and 19 more | 2026-03-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Acceptance of some invalid Transfer-Encoding headers in the HTTP/1 client in net/http before Go 1.17.12 and Go 1.18.4 allows HTTP request smuggling if combined with an intermediate server that also improperly fails to reject the header as invalid. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0536 | 2 Follow-redirects Project, Redhat | 7 Follow-redirects, Acm, Openshift Data Foundation and 4 more | 2026-02-24 | 2.6 Low |
| Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer in NPM follow-redirects prior to 1.14.8. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14874 | 2 Nodemailer, Redhat | 6 Nodemailer, Acm, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes and 3 more | 2026-01-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Nodemailer. This vulnerability allows a denial of service (DoS) via a crafted email address header that triggers infinite recursion in the address parser. | ||||