Filtered by vendor Apple
Subscriptions
Total
15195 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-19304 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-09-08 | 7.7 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information from internal services due to a URL parser discrepancy. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19305 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-09-08 | 8.6 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19306 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-09-08 | 7.7 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 allows an authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files from the server filesystem — including server secret material (secret_key, JWT signing keys, the application database, /proc/self/environ, and other tenants' upload directories) — by supplying absolute paths or traversal sequences in the files parameter of an authenticated build request. The file contents were embedded as text attachments in the language model prompt and transmitted to the configured model endpoint, resulting in confidential data exfiltration. This bypassed the LANGFLOW_RESTRICT_LOCAL_FILE_ACCESS=true containment boundary, which was enforced for other file-reading components but not for the Chat Input to Message attachment pipeline. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8447 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-09-08 | 6.1 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 suffer from a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Playground chat interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9138 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-09-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 Langflow could allow an authenticated attacker to write arbitrary files to the server due to improper input validation in the SaveToFileComponent. The application constructs local file paths using attacker‑controlled input without sufficient sanitization when handling requests to the /api/v1/run/{flow_id} endpoint. An attacker with low‑privileged authenticated access (such as a valid API key or user session) can supply crafted path values, including absolute paths or path traversal sequences, allowing arbitrary file writes to locations writable by the Langflow process. Successful exploitation may lead to unauthorized file creation or modification, potentially resulting in further compromise depending on the deployment environment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9186 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-09-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 allows remote authenticated attackers to bypass localhost-only MCP configuration installation by spoofing X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1 header, enabling arbitrary writes to IDE config files (~/.cursor/mcp.json, etc.). | ||||
| CVE-2026-19298 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-09-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an authorization bypass in the flow build process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27238 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-09-08 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27222 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Bridge, Macos, Windows | 2026-09-08 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85047 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Iphone Os, Chrome | 2026-09-08 | 9.6 Critical |
| Improper input validation in Transactions Platform in Google Chrome on on iOS prior to 152.0.7977.82 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-71441 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 5 Illustrator, Illustrator Desktop 2025, Illustrator Desktop 2026 and 2 more | 2026-09-08 | 5.5 Medium |
| Illustrator is affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43820 | 1 Apple | 1 Swiftnio Ssl | 2026-09-04 | 7.7 High |
| NIOSSLCertificate._subjectAlternativeNames provides access to the raw bytes for a cert's SANs. NIOSSL provides access to a buffer assumed to be backed by an ASN1_STRING, but not all SANs are backed by ASN1_STRING, so accessing the buffer for such a type can lead to out-of-bounds memory access. This vulnerability is addressed in swift-nio-ssl version 2.37.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43823 | 1 Apple | 1 Swift-crypto | 2026-09-04 | 7.5 High |
| When initializing an RSA public key from DER or PEM bytes throws an error, the EVP_PKEY* is double-freed: first in the catch block, then in the deinit. This can lead to a crash on future memory allocations. This double-free manifests when BoringSSL cannot decode the public key from the bytes provided. This vulnerability is addressed in swift-crypto version 4.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65370 | 1 Apple | 1 Servicetalk | 2026-09-03 | 7.5 High |
| ServiceTalk HTTP/1.x incorrectly handles malformed Transfer-Encoding which could result in request smuggling attacks. This vulnerability is addressed in servicetalk version 0.42.65. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58641 | 3 Apple, Linux, Microsoft | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 2 more | 2026-09-03 | 7.8 High |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43798 | 1 Apple | 1 Swiftnio Ssh | 2026-09-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| A single crafted SSH message gives an unauthenticated network attacker an out-of-bounds stack write of attacker-controlled length and content against any application built on swift-nio-ssh. This vulnerability is addressed in swift-nio-ssh version 0.14.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78957 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Iphone Os, Chrome | 2026-09-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| Information leak in Mobile in Google Chrome on on iOS prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a local attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted file. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-64773 | 1 Apple | 1 Container | 2026-09-01 | 7.5 High |
| An attacker that can reach a container's published TCP port may be able to force the host's forwarding process to buffer an unbounded amount of that client's data in memory, for as long as the backend container connection takes to complete — with no cap on how much accumulates or how long the wait can be stretched. This vulnerability is addressed in container version 1.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64785 | 1 Apple | 2 Swiftnio Http/2, Swiftnio Http\/2 | 2026-09-01 | 5.3 Medium |
| SwiftNIO HTTP/2 was missing validation on inbound HEADERS frames that let CR, LF, NUL, SP and other control characters reach an HTTP/1.1 backend through NIOHTTP2's HTTP/2-to-HTTP/1 codec, enabling HTTP request smuggling or response splitting. This vulnerability is addressed in swift-nio-http2 version 1.45.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79230 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Macos, Chrome | 2026-08-31 | 8.8 High |
| Improper input validation in ANGLE in Google Chrome on on Mac prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||