Filtered by vendor Kubernetes
Subscriptions
Total
125 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-1974 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Ingress-nginx | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where under certain conditions, an unauthenticated attacker with access to the pod network can achieve arbitrary code execution in the context of the ingress-nginx controller. This can lead to disclosure of Secrets accessible to the controller. (Note that in the default installation, the controller can access all Secrets cluster-wide.) | ||||
| CVE-2025-4563 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubernetes | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low |
| A vulnerability exists in the NodeRestriction admission controller where nodes can bypass dynamic resource allocation authorization checks. When the DynamicResourceAllocation feature gate is enabled, the controller properly validates resource claim statuses during pod status updates but fails to perform equivalent validation during pod creation. This allows a compromised node to create mirror pods that access unauthorized dynamic resources, potentially leading to privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24514 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Ingress-nginx | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx where the `auth-url` Ingress annotation can be used to inject configuration into nginx. This can lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the ingress-nginx controller, and disclosure of Secrets accessible to the controller. (Note that in the default installation, the controller can access all Secrets cluster-wide.) | ||||
| CVE-2025-59303 | 2 Haproxy, Kubernetes | 3 Haproxy, Haproxy Ingress Controller, Kubernetes | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| HAProxy Kubernetes Ingress Controller before 3.1.13, when the config-snippets feature flag is used, accepts config snippets from users with create/update permissions. This can result in obtaining an ingress token secret as a response. The fixed versions of HAProxy Enterprise Kubernetes Ingress Controller are 3.0.16-ee1, 1.11.13-ee1, and 1.9.15-ee1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7646 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Ingress-nginx | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx where an actor with permission to create Ingress objects (in the `networking.k8s.io` or `extensions` API group) can bypass annotation validation to inject arbitrary commands and obtain the credentials of the ingress-nginx controller. In the default configuration, that credential has access to all secrets in the cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10220 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubelet | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| The Kubernetes kubelet component allows arbitrary command execution via specially crafted gitRepo volumes.This issue affects kubelet: through 1.28.11, from 1.29.0 through 1.29.6, from 1.30.0 through 1.30.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3864 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Csi Driver For Nfs | 2026-03-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability was discovered in the Kubernetes CSI Driver for NFS where the subDir parameter in volume identifiers was insufficiently validated. Attackers with the ability to create PersistentVolumes referencing the NFS CSI driver could craft volume identifiers containing path traversal sequences (../). During volume deletion or cleanup operations, the driver could operate on unintended directories outside the intended managed path within the NFS export. This may lead to deletion or modification of directories on the NFS server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4342 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Ingress-nginx | 2026-03-21 | 8.8 High |
| A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx where a combination of Ingress annotations can be used to inject configuration into nginx. This can lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the ingress-nginx controller, and disclosure of Secrets accessible to the controller. (Note that in the default installation, the controller can access all Secrets cluster-wide.) | ||||
| CVE-2025-57870 | 4 Esri, Kubernetes, Linux and 1 more | 5 Arcgis Server, Kubernetes, Linux and 2 more | 2026-02-26 | 10 Critical |
| A SQL Injection vulnerability exists in Esri ArcGIS Server versions 11.3, 11.4 and 11.5 on Windows, Linux and Kubernetes. This vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a specific ArcGIS Feature Service operation. Successful exploitation can potentially result in unauthorized access, modification, or deletion of data from the underlying Enterprise Geodatabase. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5154 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 4 Cri-o, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 1 more | 2026-02-25 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in cri-o. A malicious container can create a symbolic link to arbitrary files on the host via directory traversal (“../“). This flaw allows the container to read and write to arbitrary files on the host system. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5528 | 4 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes, Microsoft and 1 more | 4 Fedora, Kubernetes, Windows and 1 more | 2026-02-25 | 7.2 High |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods and persistent volumes on Windows nodes may be able to escalate to admin privileges on those nodes. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they are using an in-tree storage plugin for Windows nodes. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11253 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 5 Kubernetes, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform and 2 more | 2026-02-24 | 7.5 High |
| Improper input validation in the Kubernetes API server in versions v1.0-1.12 and versions prior to v1.13.12, v1.14.8, v1.15.5, and v1.16.2 allows authorized users to send malicious YAML or JSON payloads, causing the API server to consume excessive CPU or memory, potentially crashing and becoming unavailable. Prior to v1.14.0, default RBAC policy authorized anonymous users to submit requests that could trigger this vulnerability. Clusters upgraded from a version prior to v1.14.0 keep the more permissive policy by default for backwards compatibility. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25743 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubernetes | 2026-01-13 | 3 Low |
| kubectl does not neutralize escape, meta or control sequences contained in the raw data it outputs to a terminal. This includes but is not limited to the unstructured string fields in objects such as Events. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9486 | 2 Kubernetes, Kubernetes-sigs | 2 Image Builder, Image Builder | 2025-12-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| A security issue was discovered in the Kubernetes Image Builder versions <= v0.1.37 where default credentials are enabled during the image build process. Virtual machine images built using the Proxmox provider do not disable these default credentials, and nodes using the resulting images may be accessible via these default credentials. The credentials can be used to gain root access. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if their nodes use VM images created via the Image Builder project with its Proxmox provider. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9594 | 2 Kubernetes, Kubernetes-sigs | 2 Image Builder, Image Builder | 2025-12-08 | 6.3 Medium |
| A security issue was discovered in the Kubernetes Image Builder versions <= v0.1.37 where default credentials are enabled during the image build process when using the Nutanix, OVA, QEMU or raw providers. The credentials can be used to gain root access. The credentials are disabled at the conclusion of the image build process. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if their nodes use VM images created via the Image Builder project. Because these images were vulnerable during the image build process, they are affected only if an attacker was able to reach the VM where the image build was happening and used the vulnerability to modify the image at the time the image build was occurring. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45310 | 5 Docker, Kubernetes, Linux and 2 more | 5 Docker, Kubernetes, Linux Kernel and 2 more | 2025-11-25 | 3.6 Low |
| runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification. runc 1.1.13 and earlier, as well as 1.2.0-rc2 and earlier, can be tricked into creating empty files or directories in arbitrary locations in the host filesystem by sharing a volume between two containers and exploiting a race with `os.MkdirAll`. While this could be used to create empty files, existing files would not be truncated. An attacker must have the ability to start containers using some kind of custom volume configuration. Containers using user namespaces are still affected, but the scope of places an attacker can create inodes can be significantly reduced. Sufficiently strict LSM policies (SELinux/Apparmor) can also in principle block this attack -- we suspect the industry standard SELinux policy may restrict this attack's scope but the exact scope of protection hasn't been analysed. This is exploitable using runc directly as well as through Docker and Kubernetes. The issue is fixed in runc v1.1.14 and v1.2.0-rc3. Some workarounds are available. Using user namespaces restricts this attack fairly significantly such that the attacker can only create inodes in directories that the remapped root user/group has write access to. Unless the root user is remapped to an actual user on the host (such as with rootless containers that don't use `/etc/sub[ug]id`), this in practice means that an attacker would only be able to create inodes in world-writable directories. A strict enough SELinux or AppArmor policy could in principle also restrict the scope if a specific label is applied to the runc runtime, though neither the extent to which the standard existing policies block this attack nor what exact policies are needed to sufficiently restrict this attack have been thoroughly tested. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3893 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Csi Proxy | 2025-08-01 | 8.8 High |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods on Windows nodes running kubernetes-csi-proxy may be able to escalate to admin privileges on those nodes. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they include Windows nodes running kubernetes-csi-proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25736 | 3 Kubernetes, Microsoft, Redhat | 3 Kubernetes, Windows, Openshift | 2025-06-12 | 5.8 Medium |
| Kube-proxy on Windows can unintentionally forward traffic to local processes listening on the same port (“spec.ports[*].port”) as a LoadBalancer Service when the LoadBalancer controller does not set the “status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip” field. Clusters where the LoadBalancer controller sets the “status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip” field are unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5044 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Ingress-nginx | 2025-06-12 | 7.6 High |
| Code injection via nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/permanent-redirect annotation. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2995 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Cri-o, Openshift | 2025-05-29 | 7.1 High |
| Incorrect handling of the supplementary groups in the CRI-O container engine might lead to sensitive information disclosure or possible data modification if an attacker has direct access to the affected container where supplementary groups are used to set access permissions and is able to execute a binary code in that container. | ||||