Filtered by vendor Sendmail Subscriptions
Total 33 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2001-1349 2 Redhat, Sendmail 2 Linux, Sendmail 2026-04-16 N/A
Sendmail before 8.11.4, and 8.12.0 before 8.12.0.Beta10, allows local users to cause a denial of service and possibly corrupt the heap and gain privileges via race conditions in signal handlers.
CVE-2001-0713 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2026-04-16 N/A
Sendmail before 8.12.1 does not properly drop privileges when the -C option is used to load custom configuration files, which allows local users to gain privileges via malformed arguments in the configuration file whose names contain characters with the high bit set, such as (1) macro names that are one character long, (2) a variable setting which is processed by the setoption function, or (3) a Modifiers setting which is processed by the getmodifiers function.
CVE-2002-1827 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2026-04-16 N/A
Sendmail 8.9.0 through 8.12.3 allows local users to cause a denial of service by obtaining an exclusive lock on the (1) alias, (2) map, (3) statistics, and (4) pid files.
CVE-2003-0688 6 Compaq, Freebsd, Openbsd and 3 more 7 Tru64, Freebsd, Openbsd and 4 more 2026-04-16 N/A
The DNS map code in Sendmail 8.12.8 and earlier, when using the "enhdnsbl" feature, does not properly initialize certain data structures, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process crash) via an invalid DNS response that causes Sendmail to free incorrect data.
CVE-1999-1309 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2026-04-16 N/A
Sendmail before 8.6.7 allows local users to gain root access via a large value in the debug (-d) command line option.
CVE-1999-0478 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2026-04-16 N/A
Denial of service in HP-UX sendmail 8.8.6 related to accepting connections.
CVE-1999-1580 2 Sendmail, Sun 2 Sendmail, Sunos 2026-04-16 N/A
SunOS sendmail 5.59 through 5.65 uses popen to process a forwarding host argument, which allows local users to gain root privileges by modifying the IFS (Internal Field Separator) variable and passing crafted values to the -oR option.
CVE-2002-2261 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2026-04-16 N/A
Sendmail 8.9.0 through 8.12.6 allows remote attackers to bypass relaying restrictions enforced by the 'check_relay' function by spoofing a blank DNS hostname.
CVE-2002-0906 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2026-04-16 N/A
Buffer overflow in Sendmail before 8.12.5, when configured to use a custom DNS map to query TXT records, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a malicious DNS server.
CVE-2005-2070 1 Sendmail 1 Sendmail 2026-04-16 N/A
The ClamAV Mail fILTER (clamav-milter) 0.84 through 0.85d, when used in Sendmail using long timeouts, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by keeping an open connection, which prevents ClamAV from reloading.
CVE-2014-3956 4 Fedoraproject, Freebsd, Hp and 1 more 4 Fedora, Freebsd, Hpux and 1 more 2025-04-12 N/A
The sm_close_on_exec function in conf.c in sendmail before 8.14.9 has arguments in the wrong order, and consequently skips setting expected FD_CLOEXEC flags, which allows local users to access unintended high-numbered file descriptors via a custom mail-delivery program.
CVE-2023-51765 3 Freebsd, Redhat, Sendmail 3 Freebsd, Enterprise Linux, Sendmail 2024-11-21 5.3 Medium
sendmail through 8.17.2 allows SMTP smuggling in certain configurations. Remote attackers can use a published exploitation technique to inject e-mail messages with a spoofed MAIL FROM address, allowing bypass of an SPF protection mechanism. This occurs because sendmail supports <LF>.<CR><LF> but some other popular e-mail servers do not. This is resolved in 8.18 and later versions with 'o' in srv_features.
CVE-2021-3618 5 Debian, F5, Fedoraproject and 2 more 5 Debian Linux, Nginx, Fedora and 2 more 2024-11-21 7.4 High
ALPACA is an application layer protocol content confusion attack, exploiting TLS servers implementing different protocols but using compatible certificates, such as multi-domain or wildcard certificates. A MiTM attacker having access to victim's traffic at the TCP/IP layer can redirect traffic from one subdomain to another, resulting in a valid TLS session. This breaks the authentication of TLS and cross-protocol attacks may be possible where the behavior of one protocol service may compromise the other at the application layer.