Total
379 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-1953 | 2026-04-15 | 2.6 Low | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in vLLM AIBrix 0.2.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file pkg/plugins/gateway/prefixcacheindexer/hash.go of the component Prefix Caching. The manipulation leads to insufficiently random values. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. Upgrading to version 0.3.0 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7783 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Use of Insufficiently Random Values vulnerability in form-data allows HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP). This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/form_data.Js. This issue affects form-data: < 2.5.4, 3.0.0 - 3.0.3, 4.0.0 - 4.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11707 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Login Lockdown & Protection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to IP Block Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.14. This is due to $unblock_key key being insufficiently random allowing unauthenticated users, with access to an administrative user email, to generate valid unblock keys for their IP Address. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass blocks due to invalid login attempts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4607 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The PSW Front-end Login & Registration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.12 via the customer_registration() function. This is due to the use of a weak, low-entropy OTP mechanism in the forget() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to initiate a password reset for any user, including administrators, and elevate their privileges for full site takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10745 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Banhammer – Monitor Site Traffic, Block Bad Users and Bots plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blocking Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.8. This is due to a site-wide “secret key” being deterministically generated from a constant character set using md5() and base64_encode() and then stored in the `banhammer_secret_key` option. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass the plugin’s logging and blocking by appending a GET parameter named `banhammer-process_{SECRET}` where `{SECRET}` is the predictable value, thereby causing Banhammer to abort its protections for that request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6515 | 1 Oatpp | 1 Mcp | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| The MCP SSE endpoint in oatpp-mcp returns an instance pointer as the session ID, which is not unique nor cryptographically secure. This allows network attackers with access to the oatpp-mcp server to guess future session IDs and hijack legitimate client MCP sessions, returning malicious responses from the oatpp-mcp server. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22150 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift Ai, Rhdh | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12432 | 2 Wordpress, Wpclever | 2 Wordpress, Wpc Shop As A Customer For Woocommerce | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| The WPC Shop as a Customer for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to account takeover and privilege escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.8. This is due to the 'generate_key' function not producing a sufficiently random value. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to log in as site administrators, granted they have triggered the ajax_login() function which generates a unique key that can be used to log in. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13470 | 1 Ribose | 1 Rnp | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| In RNP version 0.18.0 a refactoring regression causes the symmetric session key used for Public-Key Encrypted Session Key (PKESK) packets to be left uninitialized except for zeroing, resulting in it always being an all-zero byte array. Any data encrypted using public-key encryption in this release can be decrypted trivially by supplying an all-zero session key, fully compromising confidentiality. The vulnerability affects only public key encryption (PKESK packets). Passphrase-based encryption (SKESK packets) is not affected. Root cause: Vulnerable session key buffer used in PKESK packet generation. The defect was introduced in commit `7bd9a8dc356aae756b40755be76d36205b6b161a` where initialization logic inside `encrypted_build_skesk()` only randomized the key for the SKESK path and omitted it for the PKESK path. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35292 | 1 Siemens | 10 Simatic S7-200 Smart Cpu Cr40, Simatic S7-200 Smart Cpu Cr60, Simatic S7-200 Smart Cpu Sr20 and 7 more | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU CR40 (6ES7288-1CR40-0AA0) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU CR60 (6ES7288-1CR60-0AA0) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR20 (6ES7288-1SR20-0AA0) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR20 (6ES7288-1SR20-0AA1) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR30 (6ES7288-1SR30-0AA0) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR30 (6ES7288-1SR30-0AA1) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR40 (6ES7288-1SR40-0AA0) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR40 (6ES7288-1SR40-0AA1) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR60 (6ES7288-1SR60-0AA0) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR60 (6ES7288-1SR60-0AA1) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST20 (6ES7288-1ST20-0AA0) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST20 (6ES7288-1ST20-0AA1) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST30 (6ES7288-1ST30-0AA0) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST30 (6ES7288-1ST30-0AA1) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST40 (6ES7288-1ST40-0AA0) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST40 (6ES7288-1ST40-0AA1) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST60 (6ES7288-1ST60-0AA0) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST60 (6ES7288-1ST60-0AA1) (All versions). Affected devices are using a predictable IP ID sequence number. This leaves the system susceptible to a family of attacks which rely on the use of predictable IP ID sequence numbers as their base method of attack and eventually could allow an attacker to create a denial of service condition. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13955 | 1 Actions-micro | 2 Ezcast Pro Ii, Ezcast Pro Ii Firmware | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Predictable default Wi-Fi Password in Access Point functionality in EZCast Pro II version 1.17478.146 allows attackers in Wi-Fi range to gain access to the dongle by calculating the default password from observable device identifiers | ||||
| CVE-2024-5149 | 1 Themekraft | 1 Buddyforms | 2026-04-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| The BuddyForms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Email Verification Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.9 via the use of an insufficiently random activation code. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass the email verification. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0761 | 1 Filemanagerpro | 1 File Manager | 2026-04-08 | 8.1 High |
| The File Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 7.2.1 due to insufficient randomness in the backup filenames, which use a timestamp plus 4 random digits. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers, to extract sensitive data including site backups in configurations where the .htaccess file in the directory does not block access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5868 | 1 Wpwebelite | 1 Woocommerce Social Login | 2026-04-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| The WooCommerce - Social Login plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Email Verification in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.2 via the use of insufficiently random activation code. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass the email verification. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6799 | 1 Webfactoryltd | 1 Wp Reset | 2026-04-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| The WP Reset – Most Advanced WordPress Reset Tool plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.0 via the use of insufficiently random snapshot names. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including site backups by brute-forcing the snapshot filenames. Please note that the vendor does not plan to do any further hardening on this functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34511 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.4.2 reuses the PKCE verifier as the OAuth state parameter in the Gemini OAuth flow, exposing it through the redirect URL. Attackers who capture the redirect URL can obtain both the authorization code and PKCE verifier, defeating PKCE protection and enabling token redemption. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51346 | 1 Eufy | 1 Homebase 2 | 2026-03-26 | 7.7 High |
| An issue in Eufy Homebase 2 version 3.3.4.1h allows a local attacker to obtain sensitive information via the cryptographic scheme. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15603 | 1 Open-webui | 1 Open-webui | 2026-03-11 | 3.7 Low |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in open-webui up to 0.6.16. Affected is an unknown function of the file backend/start_windows.bat of the component JWT Key Handler. Such manipulation of the argument WEBUI_SECRET_KEY leads to insufficiently random values. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30629 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 15 Go, Acm, Ceph Storage and 12 more | 2026-03-06 | 3.1 Low |
| Non-random values for ticket_age_add in session tickets in crypto/tls before Go 1.17.11 and Go 1.18.3 allow an attacker that can observe TLS handshakes to correlate successive connections by comparing ticket ages during session resumption. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48928 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2026-02-27 | 7.5 High |
| Piwigo is an open source photo gallery application for the web. In versions on the 14.x branch, when installing, the secret_key configuration parameter is set to MD5(RAND()) in MySQL. However, RAND() only has 30 bits of randomness, making it feasible to brute-force the secret key. The CSRF token is constructed partially from the secret key, and this can be used to check if the brute force succeeded. Trying all possible values takes approximately one hour. The impact of this is limited. The auto login key uses the user's password on top of the secret key. The pwg token uses the user's session identifier on top of the secret key. It seems that values for get_ephemeral_key can be generated when one knows the secret key. Version 15.0.0 contains a fix for the issue. | ||||