Filtered by CWE-352
Total 9168 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2012-4568 1 Letodms Project 1 Letodms 2025-04-20 N/A
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in LetoDMS (formerly MyDMS) before 3.3.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
CVE-2016-4884 1 Basercms 1 Basercms 2025-04-20 N/A
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS plugin Blog version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2017-8874 1 Acquia 1 Mautic 2025-04-20 N/A
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Mautic 1.4.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) delete email campaigns or (2) delete contacts.
CVE-2015-8255 1 Axis 1 Axis Communications Firmware 2025-04-20 N/A
AXIS Communications products allow CSRF, as demonstrated by admin/pwdgrp.cgi, vaconfig.cgi, and admin/local_del.cgi.
CVE-2017-7178 2 Debian, Deluge-torrent 2 Debian Linux, Deluge 2025-04-20 8.8 High
CSRF was discovered in the web UI in Deluge before 1.3.14. The exploitation methodology involves (1) hosting a crafted plugin that executes an arbitrary program from its __init__.py file and (2) causing the victim to download, install, and enable this plugin.
CVE-2017-14924 1 Tiki 1 Tikiwiki Cms\/groupware 2025-04-20 N/A
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via IMG element in Tiki before 16.3, 17.x before 17.1, 12 LTS before 12.12 LTS, and 15 LTS before 15.5 LTS allows an authenticated user to gain administrator privileges if an administrator opens a wiki page with an IMG element, related to tiki-assignuser.php.
CVE-2016-3406 1 Synacor 1 Zimbra Collaboration Suite 2025-04-20 N/A
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Zimbra Collaboration before 8.7.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via vectors involving (1) the Client uploader extension or (2) extension REST handlers, aka bugs 104294 and 104456.
CVE-2017-7446 1 Helpdezk 1 Helpdezk 2025-04-20 N/A
HelpDEZk 1.1.1 has CSRF in admin/home#/person/ with an impact of obtaining admin privileges.
CVE-2017-7571 1 Ladybirdweb 1 Faveo Helpdesk 2025-04-20 8.0 High
public/rolechangeadmin in Faveo 1.9.3 allows CSRF. The impact is obtaining admin privileges.
CVE-2015-8623 1 Mediawiki 1 Mediawiki 2025-04-20 N/A
The User::matchEditToken function in includes/User.php in MediaWiki before 1.23.12 and 1.24.x before 1.24.5 does not perform token comparison in constant time before returning, which allows remote attackers to guess the edit token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8624.
CVE-2017-5169 1 Hanwha-security 1 Smart Security Manager 2025-04-20 7.5 High
An issue was discovered in Hanwha Techwin Smart Security Manager Versions 1.5 and prior. Multiple Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities have been identified. The flaws exist within the Redis and Apache Felix Gogo servers that are installed as part of this product. By issuing specific HTTP Post requests, an attacker can gain system level access to a remote shell session. Smart Security Manager Versions 1.5 and prior are affected by these vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities can allow for remote code execution.
CVE-2014-6106 1 Ibm 1 Security Identity Manager 2025-04-20 N/A
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Security Identity Manager 5.1, 6.0, and 7.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that can cause cross-site scripting attacks, web cache poisoning, or other unspecified impacts via unknown vectors.
CVE-2017-9062 2 Debian, Wordpress 2 Debian Linux, Wordpress 2025-04-20 N/A
In WordPress before 4.7.5, there is improper handling of post meta data values in the XML-RPC API.
CVE-2017-9673 1 Simplece 1 Simplece 2025-04-20 N/A
In SimpleCE 2.3.0, a CSRF vulnerability can be exploited to add an administrator account (via the index.php/user/new URI) or change its settings (via the index.php/user/1 URI), including its password.
CVE-2017-9033 1 Trendmicro 1 Serverprotect 2025-04-20 8.8 High
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to start an update from an arbitrary source via a crafted request to SProtectLinux/scanoption_set.cgi, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens.
CVE-2017-1097 1 Ibm 1 Emptoris Strategic Supply Management 2025-04-20 N/A
IBM Emptoris Strategic Supply Management Platform 10.0.0.x through 10.1.1.x is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 120657.
CVE-2017-6411 1 Dlink 2 Dsl-2730u, Dsl-2730u Firmware 2025-04-20 N/A
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on D-Link DSL-2730U C1 IN_1.00 devices allows remote attackers to change the DNS or firewall configuration or any password.
CVE-2017-9413 1 Subsonic 1 Subsonic 2025-04-20 N/A
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Podcast feature in Subsonic 6.1.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) subscribe to a podcast via the add parameter to podcastReceiverAdmin.view or (2) update Internet Radio Settings via the urlRedirectCustomUrl parameter to networkSettings.view. NOTE: These vulnerabilities can be exploited to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks.
CVE-2017-6819 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-04-20 N/A
In WordPress before 4.7.3, there is cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in Press This (wp-admin/includes/class-wp-press-this.php), leading to excessive use of server resources. The CSRF can trigger an outbound HTTP request for a large file that is then parsed by Press This.
CVE-2017-16244 1 Octobercms 1 October 2025-04-20 N/A
Cross-Site Request Forgery exists in OctoberCMS 1.0.426 (aka Build 426) due to improper validation of CSRF tokens for postback handling, allowing an attacker to successfully take over the victim's account. The attack bypasses a protection mechanism involving X-CSRF headers and CSRF tokens via a certain _handler postback variable.