Total
390031 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-74761 | 1 Apache | 3 Activemq, Activemq All, Activemq Broker | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| Improper input validation in TopicRegion in Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ Broker, and Apache ActiveMQ All on all platforms. An authenticated client can spoof clientId when removing a durable topic subscription. This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.11, from 6.0.0 before 6.3.2; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.11, from 6.0.0 before 6.3.2; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.11, from 6.0.0 before 6.3.2. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.3.2 or 5.19.11 which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54054 | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Transmute is a free, open-source, self-hosted file conversion and compression tool. Prior to version 1.3.0, Transmute's URL import endpoint, `POST /api/files/url`, is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The HTTP downloader used by this endpoint fetches user-supplied URLs with redirects enabled and does not validate whether the target resolves to a public, external address. As a result, an authenticated user (or guest user if they are enabled) may be able to cause the Transmute server to make HTTP requests to internal or cloud-local resources from the server's network position. Because downloaded content is stored and can later be retrieved through `GET /api/files/{id}`, this issue can result in full-read SSRF rather than blind SSRF. This is fixed in version 1.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75624 | 1 Ibm | 1 App Connect Enterprise | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.1, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.27 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to incorrect authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21095 | 1 Samsung Mobile | 1 Samsung Mobile Devices | 2026-09-10 | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in DNG decoder of libimagecodec.quram.so prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86757 | 2 Grokability, Snipeitapp | 2 Snipe-it, Snipe-it | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| Snipe-IT before 8.7.0 fails to properly gate access to encrypted custom-field values in asset form templates for listbox, textarea, markdown-textarea, and date/datetime picker elements. Authenticated users with assets.edit, assets.checkin, assets.checkout, or assets.audit permissions can read plaintext encrypted custom field values by opening asset forms, bypassing the assets.view.encrypted_custom_fields permission check. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86760 | 2 Grokability, Snipeitapp | 2 Snipe-it, Snipe-it | 2026-09-10 | 5.4 Medium |
| Snipe-IT versions 8.2.0 through 8.6.x (fixed in 8.7.0) contain an incorrect authorization flaw in app/Http/Controllers/Users/UsersController::update(). The single-user edit route assigned the activated field from the request payload before evaluating the canEditAuthFields authorization gate, so an authenticated non-admin user holding the users.edit permission in the target's company scope can submit a full valid PUT request to /users/{id} and toggle the activated flag on any user, including admin and superuser accounts. Deactivating an admin locks that account out of the application until another admin or superuser re-enables it. Only the activated field is affected; username, email, password and permissions remain protected by the gate, no data is disclosed, and the API (Api\UsersController::update) and bulk-edit paths are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75777 | 1 Ibm | 1 Aspera Enterprise Webapps | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.5 could allow a local attacker to escape container protections due to unrestricted system calls being permitted within the container. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76059 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 An attacker who could submit custom component source code could bypass the static security scanner by crafting an annotated class-body assignment that resolved to a dangerous callable through alias tracking; the resolved value was never checked against the dangerous callable blocklist due to the logic error. If the crafted component reached the runtime execution path, the attacker could cause arbitrary operating system commands to execute on the server in-process, with the privileges of the running service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78569 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an incomplete denylist in the security scanner. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78571 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an unguarded eval() call on attacker-controlled input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18255 | 1 Redhat | 2 Quay, Quay 3 | 2026-09-10 | 7.2 High |
| A flaw was found in Quay. A user configured in GLOBAL_READONLY_SUPER_USERS is able to view robot account tokens for repositories they are not a member of, allowing an attacker with read-only superuser privileges to impersonate any robot account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78575 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper validation of command-line arguments in the MCP stdio server configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79723 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of user-controlled API endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79724 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79725 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files due to improper access control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79742 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an incomplete environment variable blocklist. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80378 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-10 | 8.5 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80380 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-10 | 7.1 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to cross-site request forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80434 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-10 | 7.4 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to manipulate runtime caches and cause a denial of service due to an insecure direct object reference. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80424 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to create arbitrary files due to path traversal during archive extraction. | ||||