Total
73 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-7848 | 1 Ni | 1 Labview | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| A memory corruption vulnerability due to improper input validation in lvpict.cpp exists in NI LabVIEW that may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2025 Q1 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7849 | 1 Ni | 1 Labview | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| A memory corruption vulnerability due to improper error handling when a VILinkObj is null exists in NI LabVIEW that may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2025 Q1 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67268 | 1 Gpsd Project | 1 Gpsd | 2026-01-12 | 9.8 Critical |
| gpsd before commit dc966aa contains a heap-based out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the drivers/driver_nmea2000.c file. The hnd_129540 function, which handles NMEA2000 PGN 129540 (GNSS Satellites in View) packets, fails to validate the user-supplied satellite count against the size of the skyview array (184 elements). This allows an attacker to write beyond the bounds of the array by providing a satellite count up to 255, leading to memory corruption, Denial of Service (DoS), and potentially arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-26926 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2025-12-23 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: binder: check offset alignment in binder_get_object() Commit 6d98eb95b450 ("binder: avoid potential data leakage when copying txn") introduced changes to how binder objects are copied. In doing so, it unintentionally removed an offset alignment check done through calls to binder_alloc_copy_from_buffer() -> check_buffer(). These calls were replaced in binder_get_object() with copy_from_user(), so now an explicit offset alignment check is needed here. This avoids later complications when unwinding the objects gets harder. It is worth noting this check existed prior to commit 7a67a39320df ("binder: add function to copy binder object from buffer"), likely removed due to redundancy at the time. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48502 | 1 Amd | 1 Uprof | 2025-11-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| Improper input validation within AMD uprof can allow a local attacker to overwrite MSR registers, potentially resulting in crash or denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48511 | 1 Amd | 1 Uprof | 2025-11-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| Improper input validation within AMD uprof can allow a local attacker to write to an arbitrary physical address, potentially resulting in crash or denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55087 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Netx Duo | 2025-10-24 | 7.5 High |
| In NextX Duo's snmp addon versions before 6.4.4, a part of the Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, an attacker could cause an out-of-bound read by a crafted SNMPv3 security parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55086 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Netx Duo | 2025-10-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| In NetXDuo version before 6.4.4, a networking support module for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, in the DHCPV6 client there was an unchecked index extracting the server DUID from the server reply. With a crafted packet, an attacker could cause an out of memory read. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57775 | 2 Digilent, Ni | 2 Dasylab, Dasylab | 2025-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| There is a heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability due to improper bounds checking when parsing a DSB file with Digilent DASYLab. This vulnerability may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted DSB file. The vulnerability affects all versions of DASYLab. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57776 | 2 Digilent, Ni | 2 Dasylab, Dasylab | 2025-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| There is an out of bounds write vulnerability due to improper bounds checking resulting in an invalid address when parsing a DSB file with Digilent DASYLab. This vulnerability may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted DSB file. The vulnerability affects all versions of DASYLab. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57777 | 2 Digilent, Ni | 2 Dasylab, Dasylab | 2025-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| There is an out of bounds write vulnerability due to improper bounds checking in displ2.dll when parsing a DSB file with Digilent DASYLab. This vulnerability may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted DSB file. The vulnerability affects all versions of DASYLab. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57778 | 2 Digilent, Ni | 2 Dasylab, Dasylab | 2025-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| There is an out of bounds write vulnerability due to improper bounds checking resulting in an invalid source address when parsing a DSB file with Digilent DASYLab. This vulnerability may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted DSB file. The vulnerability affects all versions of DASYLab. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9189 | 2 Digilent, Ni | 2 Dasylab, Dasylab | 2025-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| There is an out of bounds write vulnerability due to improper bounds checking resulting in a large destination address when parsing a DSB file with Digilent DASYLab. This vulnerability may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted DSB file. The vulnerability affects all versions of DASYLab. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57774 | 2 Digilent, Ni | 2 Dasylab, Dasylab | 2025-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| There is an out of bounds write vulnerability due to improper bounds checking resulting in invalid data when parsing a DSB file with Digilent DASYLab. This vulnerability may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted DSB file. The vulnerability affects all versions of DASYLab. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0123 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Nvidia | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Cuda Toolkit | 2025-09-18 | 3.3 Low |
| NVIDIA CUDA toolkit for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the nvdisasm command line tool where an attacker may cause an improper validation in input issue by tricking the user into running nvdisasm on a malicious ELF file. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2634 | 1 Ni | 1 Labview | 2025-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| Out of bounds read vulnerability due to improper bounds checking in NI LabVIEW in fontmgr may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2025 Q1 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2633 | 1 Ni | 1 Labview | 2025-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| Out of bounds read vulnerability due to improper bounds checking in NI LabVIEW in lvre!UDecStrToNum that may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2025 Q1 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22201 | 1 Juniper | 10 Junos, Srx4000, Srx4100 and 7 more | 2025-05-12 | 7.5 High |
| An Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated network-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). On SRX5000 Series with SPC3, SRX4000 Series, and vSRX, when PowerMode IPsec is configured and a malformed ESP packet matching an established IPsec tunnel is received the PFE crashes. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX5000 Series with SPC3, SRX4000 Series, and vSRX: All versions prior to 19.4R2-S6, 19.4R3-S7; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S4; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S3; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S2; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R1-S2, 21.3R2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22223 | 1 Juniper | 4 Junos, Qfx10002, Qfx10008 and 1 more | 2025-05-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| On QFX10000 Series devices using Juniper Networks Junos OS when configured as transit IP/MPLS penultimate hop popping (PHP) nodes with link aggregation group (LAG) interfaces, an Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input weakness allows an attacker sending certain IP packets to cause multiple interfaces in the LAG to detach causing a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Continued receipt and processing of these packets will sustain the Denial of Service. This issue affects IPv4 and IPv6 packets. Packets of either type can cause and sustain the DoS event. These packets can be destined to the device or be transit packets. On devices such as the QFX10008 with line cards, line cards can be restarted to restore service. On devices such as the QFX10002 you can restart the PFE service, or reboot device to restore service. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX10000 Series: All versions prior to 15.1R7-S11; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S10, 18.4R3-S10; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R3-S8; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3-S4; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S5; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S6, 19.4R3-S7; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S2; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S4; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S1. An indicator of compromise may be seen by issuing the command: request pfe execute target fpc0 command "show jspec pechip[3] registers ps l2_node 10" timeout 0 | refresh 1 | no-more and reviewing for backpressured output; for example: GOT: 0x220702a8 pe.ps.l2_node[10].pkt_cnt 00000076 GOT: 0x220702b4 pe.ps.l2_node[10].backpressured 00000002 <<<< STICKS HERE and requesting detail on the pepic wanio: request pfe execute target fpc0 command "show pepic 0 wanio-info" timeout 0 | no-more | match xe-0/0/0:2 GOT: 3 xe-0/0/0:2 10 6 3 0 1 10 189 10 0x6321b088 <<< LOOK HERE as well as looking for tail drops looking at the interface queue, for example: show interfaces queue xe-0/0/0:2 resulting in: Transmitted: Total-dropped packets: 1094137 0 pps << LOOK HERE | ||||
| CVE-2024-23609 | 1 Ni | 1 Labview | 2025-04-16 | 7.8 High |
| An improper error handling vulnerability in LabVIEW may result in remote code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to provide a user with a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects LabVIEW 2024 Q1 and prior versions. | ||||