Total
35280 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-11634 | 2 Furbo, Tomofun | 6 Furbo 360 Dog Camera, Furbo 360 Dog Camera Firmware, Furbo Mini and 3 more | 2025-10-30 | 2.4 Low |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Tomofun Furbo 360 and Furbo Mini. This affects an unknown part of the component UART Interface. The manipulation results in information disclosure. An attack on the physical device is feasible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The firmware versions determined to be affected are Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036 and Furbo Mini up to MC0020_FW_074. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21932 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-10-30 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: abort vma_modify() on merge out of memory failure The remainder of vma_modify() relies upon the vmg state remaining pristine after a merge attempt. Usually this is the case, however in the one edge case scenario of a merge attempt failing not due to the specified range being unmergeable, but rather due to an out of memory error arising when attempting to commit the merge, this assumption becomes untrue. This results in vmg->start, end being modified, and thus the proceeding attempts to split the VMA will be done with invalid start/end values. Thankfully, it is likely practically impossible for us to hit this in reality, as it would require a maple tree node pre-allocation failure that would likely never happen due to it being 'too small to fail', i.e. the kernel would simply keep retrying reclaim until it succeeded. However, this scenario remains theoretically possible, and what we are doing here is wrong so we must correct it. The safest option is, when this scenario occurs, to simply give up the operation. If we cannot allocate memory to merge, then we cannot allocate memory to split either (perhaps moreso!). Any scenario where this would be happening would be under very extreme (likely fatal) memory pressure, so it's best we give up early. So there is no doubt it is appropriate to simply bail out in this scenario. However, in general we must if at all possible never assume VMG state is stable after a merge attempt, since merge operations update VMG fields. As a result, additionally also make this clear by storing start, end in local variables. The issue was reported originally by syzkaller, and by Brad Spengler (via an off-list discussion), and in both instances it manifested as a triggering of the assert: VM_WARN_ON_VMG(start >= end, vmg); In vma_merge_existing_range(). It seems at least one scenario in which this is occurring is one in which the merge being attempted is due to an madvise() across multiple VMAs which looks like this: start end |<------>| |----------|------| | vma | next | |----------|------| When madvise_walk_vmas() is invoked, we first find vma in the above (determining prev to be equal to vma as we are offset into vma), and then enter the loop. We determine the end of vma that forms part of the range we are madvise()'ing by setting 'tmp' to this value: /* Here vma->vm_start <= start < (end|vma->vm_end) */ tmp = vma->vm_end; We then invoke the madvise() operation via visit(), letting prev get updated to point to vma as part of the operation: /* Here vma->vm_start <= start < tmp <= (end|vma->vm_end). */ error = visit(vma, &prev, start, tmp, arg); Where the visit() function pointer in this instance is madvise_vma_behavior(). As observed in syzkaller reports, it is ultimately madvise_update_vma() that is invoked, calling vma_modify_flags_name() and vma_modify() in turn. Then, in vma_modify(), we attempt the merge: merged = vma_merge_existing_range(vmg); if (merged) return merged; We invoke this with vmg->start, end set to start, tmp as such: start tmp |<--->| |----------|------| | vma | next | |----------|------| We find ourselves in the merge right scenario, but the one in which we cannot remove the middle (we are offset into vma). Here we have a special case where vmg->start, end get set to perhaps unintuitive values - we intended to shrink the middle VMA and expand the next. This means vmg->start, end are set to... vma->vm_start, start. Now the commit_merge() fails, and vmg->start, end are left like this. This means we return to the rest of vma_modify() with vmg->start, end (here denoted as start', end') set as: start' end' |<-->| |----------|------| | vma | next | |----------|------| So we now erroneously try to split accordingly. This is where the unfortunate ---truncated--- | ||||
| CVE-2025-21952 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-10-30 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: corsair-void: Update power supply values with a unified work handler corsair_void_process_receiver can be called from an interrupt context, locking battery_mutex in it was causing a kernel panic. Fix it by moving the critical section into its own work, sharing this work with battery_add_work and battery_remove_work to remove the need for any locking | ||||
| CVE-2021-31955 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909, Windows 10 2004 and 8 more | 2025-10-30 | 5.5 Medium |
| Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-33739 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909, Windows 10 2004 and 7 more | 2025-10-30 | 8.4 High |
| Microsoft DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-41080 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Exchange Server | 2025-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-41091 | 1 Microsoft | 18 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 15 more | 2025-10-30 | 5.4 Medium |
| Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-41049 | 1 Microsoft | 18 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 15 more | 2025-10-30 | 5.4 Medium |
| Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-24521 | 1 Microsoft | 25 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 22 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-34713 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Windows Support Diagnostic Tool (MSDT) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-30190 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when MSDT is called using the URL protocol from a calling application such as Word. An attacker who successfully exploits this vulnerability can run arbitrary code with the privileges of the calling application. The attacker can then install programs, view, change, or delete data, or create new accounts in the context allowed by the user’s rights. Please see the MSRC Blog Entry for important information about steps you can take to protect your system from this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22718 | 1 Microsoft | 25 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 22 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-42278 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Windows Server 2004, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2 and 8 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.5 High |
| Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-43226 | 1 Microsoft | 27 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 24 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-38649 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Azure Automation State Configuration, Azure Automation Update Management, Azure Diagnostics and 9 more | 2025-10-30 | 7 High |
| Open Management Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-40450 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909, Windows 10 2004 and 11 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-41357 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 2004, Windows 10 20h2 and 9 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-36948 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909, Windows 10 2004 and 8 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Update Medic Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-36955 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21983 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/slab/kvfree_rcu: Switch to WQ_MEM_RECLAIM wq Currently kvfree_rcu() APIs use a system workqueue which is "system_unbound_wq" to driver RCU machinery to reclaim a memory. Recently, it has been noted that the following kernel warning can be observed: <snip> workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM nvme-wq:nvme_scan_work is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events_unbound:kfree_rcu_work WARNING: CPU: 21 PID: 330 at kernel/workqueue.c:3719 check_flush_dependency+0x112/0x120 Modules linked in: intel_uncore_frequency(E) intel_uncore_frequency_common(E) skx_edac(E) ... CPU: 21 UID: 0 PID: 330 Comm: kworker/u144:6 Tainted: G E 6.13.2-0_g925d379822da #1 Hardware name: Wiwynn Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS YMM20 02/01/2023 Workqueue: nvme-wq nvme_scan_work RIP: 0010:check_flush_dependency+0x112/0x120 Code: 05 9a 40 14 02 01 48 81 c6 c0 00 00 00 48 8b 50 18 48 81 c7 c0 00 00 00 48 89 f9 48 ... RSP: 0018:ffffc90000df7bd8 EFLAGS: 00010082 RAX: 000000000000006a RBX: ffffffff81622390 RCX: 0000000000000027 RDX: 00000000fffeffff RSI: 000000000057ffa8 RDI: ffff88907f960c88 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff83068e50 R09: 000000000002fffd R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8881001a4400 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88907f420fb8 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88907f940000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CR2: 00007f60c3001000 CR3: 000000107d010005 CR4: 00000000007726f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0xa4/0x140 ? check_flush_dependency+0x112/0x120 ? report_bug+0xe1/0x140 ? check_flush_dependency+0x112/0x120 ? handle_bug+0x5e/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x40 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? timer_recalc_next_expiry+0x190/0x190 ? check_flush_dependency+0x112/0x120 ? check_flush_dependency+0x112/0x120 __flush_work.llvm.1643880146586177030+0x174/0x2c0 flush_rcu_work+0x28/0x30 kvfree_rcu_barrier+0x12f/0x160 kmem_cache_destroy+0x18/0x120 bioset_exit+0x10c/0x150 disk_release.llvm.6740012984264378178+0x61/0xd0 device_release+0x4f/0x90 kobject_put+0x95/0x180 nvme_put_ns+0x23/0xc0 nvme_remove_invalid_namespaces+0xb3/0xd0 nvme_scan_work+0x342/0x490 process_scheduled_works+0x1a2/0x370 worker_thread+0x2ff/0x390 ? pwq_release_workfn+0x1e0/0x1e0 kthread+0xb1/0xe0 ? __kthread_parkme+0x70/0x70 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x40 ? __kthread_parkme+0x70/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- <snip> To address this switch to use of independent WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue, so the rules are not violated from workqueue framework point of view. Apart of that, since kvfree_rcu() does reclaim memory it is worth to go with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM type of wq because it is designed for this purpose. | ||||