Total
9108 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-20421 | 1 Cisco | 4 Ata 191, Ata 191 Firmware, Ata 192 and 1 more | 2024-10-31 | 7.1 High |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ATA 190 Series Analog Telephone Adapter firmware could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device with the privileges of the targeted user. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6720 | 1 Dmytropopov | 1 Light Poll | 2024-10-28 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Light Poll WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks | ||||
| CVE-2024-20437 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2024-10-24 | 8.1 High |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and execute commands on the CLI of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading an already authenticated user to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device with the privileges of the targeted user. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43945 | 1 Latepoint | 1 Latepoint | 2024-10-24 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Latepoint LatePoint allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects LatePoint: from n/a through 4.9.91. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49290 | 1 Boxystudio | 1 Cooked | 2024-10-22 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Gora Tech LLC Cooked Pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Cooked Pro: from n/a before 1.8.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49627 | 1 Noorsplugin | 1 Wordpress Image Seo | 2024-10-22 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Noor Alam WordPress Image SEO allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WordPress Image SEO: from n/a through 1.1.4. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8507 | 1 Filemanagerpro | 1 File Manager | 2024-10-17 | 8.8 High |
| The File Manager Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 8.3.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'mk_file_folder_manager' ajax action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47828 | 1 Ampache | 1 Ampache | 2024-10-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| ampache is a web based audio/video streaming application and file manager. A CSRF attack can be performed in order to delete objects (Playlist, smartlist etc.). Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is an attack that forces authenticated users to submit a request to a Web application against which they are currently authenticated. This vulnerability can be exploited by creating a malicious script with an arbitrary playlist ID belonging to another user. When the user submits the request, their playlist will be deleted. Any User with active sessions who are tricked into submitting a malicious request are impacted, as their playlists or other objects could be deleted without their consent. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47846 | 2 Mediawiki, Wikimedia | 2 Cargo, Mediawiki-cargo | 2024-10-16 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - Cargo allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Mediawiki - Cargo: from 3.6.X before 3.6.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39408 | 1 Adobe | 2 Commerce, Magento | 2024-10-16 | 4.3 Medium |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p1, 2.4.6-p6, 2.4.5-p8, 2.4.4-p9 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to bypass security features and perform minor integrity changeson behalf of a user. The vulnerability could be exploited by tricking a victim into clicking a link or loading a page that submits a malicious request. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39409 | 1 Adobe | 2 Commerce, Magento | 2024-10-16 | 4.3 Medium |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p1, 2.4.6-p6, 2.4.5-p8, 2.4.4-p9 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to bypass security features and perform minor integrity changes on behalf of a user. The vulnerability could be exploited by tricking a victim into clicking a link or loading a page that submits a malicious request. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39410 | 1 Adobe | 2 Commerce, Magento | 2024-10-16 | 4.3 Medium |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p1, 2.4.6-p6, 2.4.5-p8, 2.4.4-p9 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to bypass security features and perform minor integrity changes on behalf of a user. The vulnerability could be exploited by tricking a victim into clicking a link or loading a page that submits a malicious request. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8477 | 1 Brevo | 1 Newsletter\, Smtp\, Email Marketing And Subscribe | 2024-10-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Brevo (formely Sendinblue) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.87. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the Init() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log out of a Brevo connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1342 | 2024-10-14 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| Unable to reproduce. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7689 | 2 Snapshot Backup Project, Versluis | 2 Snapshot Backup, Snapshot-backup | 2024-10-07 | 4.7 Medium |
| The Snapshot Backup WordPress plugin through 2.1.1 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7687 | 2 Azindex Project, Azindex Wordpress Plugin | 2 Azindex, Azindex Wordpress Plugin | 2024-10-07 | 6.1 Medium |
| The AZIndex WordPress plugin through 0.8.1 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7688 | 2 Azindex Project, Azindex Wordpress Plugin | 2 Azindex, Azindex Wordpress Plugin | 2024-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| The AZIndex WordPress plugin through 0.8.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin delete arbitrary indexes via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-7892 | 2 Vladyslav Bondarenko, Vladyslavbondarenko | 2 Adstxt, Adstxt | 2024-10-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| The adstxt Plugin WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-7690 | 1 Digireturn | 2 Dn-popup, Dn Popup | 2024-10-07 | 5.4 Medium |
| The DN Popup WordPress plugin through 1.2.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-28948 | 1 Advantech | 2 Adam-5630, Adam-5630 Firmware | 2024-10-04 | 8 High |
| Advantech ADAM-5630 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. It allows an attacker to partly circumvent the same origin policy, which is designed to prevent different websites from interfering with each other. | ||||