Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Ceph Storage
Subscriptions
Total
171 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-5245 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ceph, Ceph Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the Ceph Object Gateway (aka radosgw or RGW) in Ceph before 0.94.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted bucket name. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4053 | 2 Ceph, Redhat | 2 Ceph-deploy, Ceph Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The admin command in ceph-deploy before 1.5.25 uses world-readable permissions for /etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the file. | ||||
| CVE-2014-3583 | 4 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 1 more | 6 Http Server, Mac Os X, Os X Server and 3 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The handle_headers function in mod_proxy_fcgi.c in the mod_proxy_fcgi module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.4.10 allows remote FastCGI servers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read and daemon crash) via long response headers. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25725 | 3 Debian, Haproxy, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Haproxy, Ceph Storage and 3 more | 2025-03-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| HAProxy before 2.7.3 may allow a bypass of access control because HTTP/1 headers are inadvertently lost in some situations, aka "request smuggling." The HTTP header parsers in HAProxy may accept empty header field names, which could be used to truncate the list of HTTP headers and thus make some headers disappear after being parsed and processed for HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1. For HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, the impact is limited because the headers disappear before being parsed and processed, as if they had not been sent by the client. The fixed versions are 2.7.3, 2.6.9, 2.5.12, 2.4.22, 2.2.29, and 2.0.31. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1442 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 3 Grafana, Acm, Ceph Storage | 2025-03-11 | 6 Medium |
| A user with the permissions to create a data source can use Grafana API to create a data source with UID set to *. Doing this will grant the user access to read, query, edit and delete all data sources within the organization. | ||||
| CVE-2023-23934 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 3 Werkzeug, Ceph Storage, Openstack | 2025-03-10 | 2.6 Low |
| Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like `=value` instead of `key=value`. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like `=__Host-test=bad` for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie `=__Host-test=bad` as __Host-test=bad`. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. The issue is fixed in Werkzeug 2.2.3. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25577 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 6 Werkzeug, Ceph Storage, Openshift and 3 more | 2025-03-10 | 7.5 High |
| Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses `request.data`, `request.form`, `request.files`, or `request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)`, it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. Version 2.2.3 contains a patch for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3854 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ceph Storage | 2025-03-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Ceph, relating to the URL processing on RGW backends. An attacker can exploit the URL processing by providing a null URL to crash the RGW, causing a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2023-1410 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 2 Grafana, Ceph Storage | 2025-03-04 | 6.2 Medium |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Grafana had a stored XSS vulnerability in the Graphite FunctionDescription tooltip. The stored XSS vulnerability was possible due the value of the Function Description was not properly sanitized. An attacker needs to have control over the Graphite data source in order to manipulate a function description and a Grafana admin needs to configure the data source, later a Grafana user needs to select a tampered function and hover over the description. Users may upgrade to version 8.5.22, 9.2.15 and 9.3.11 to receive a fix. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0056 | 3 Fedoraproject, Haproxy, Redhat | 12 Extra Packages For Enterprise Linux, Fedora, Haproxy and 9 more | 2025-02-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| An uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability was discovered in HAProxy which could crash the service. This issue could allow an authenticated remote attacker to run a specially crafted malicious server in an OpenShift cluster. The biggest impact is to availability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24790 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 20 Go, Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform and 17 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| The various Is methods (IsPrivate, IsLoopback, etc) did not work as expected for IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, returning false for addresses which would return true in their traditional IPv4 forms. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24789 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 11 Go, Advanced Cluster Security, Ceph Storage and 8 more | 2025-02-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| The archive/zip package's handling of certain types of invalid zip files differs from the behavior of most zip implementations. This misalignment could be exploited to create an zip file with contents that vary depending on the implementation reading the file. The archive/zip package now rejects files containing these errors. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3128 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 3 Grafana, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux | 2025-02-13 | 9.4 Critical |
| Grafana is validating Azure AD accounts based on the email claim. On Azure AD, the profile email field is not unique and can be easily modified. This leads to account takeover and authentication bypass when Azure AD OAuth is configured with a multi-tenant app. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2801 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 2 Grafana, Ceph Storage | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Using public dashboards users can query multiple distinct data sources using mixed queries. However such query has a possibility of crashing a Grafana instance. The only feature that uses mixed queries at the moment is public dashboards, but it's also possible to cause this by calling the query API directly. This might enable malicious users to crash Grafana instances through that endpoint. Users may upgrade to version 9.4.12 and 9.5.3 to receive a fix. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2183 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 2 Grafana, Ceph Storage | 2025-02-13 | 4.1 Medium |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. The option to send a test alert is not available from the user panel UI for users having the Viewer role. It is still possible for a user with the Viewer role to send a test alert using the API as the API does not check access to this function. This might enable malicious users to abuse the functionality by sending multiple alert messages to e-mail and Slack, spamming users, prepare Phishing attack or block SMTP server. Users may upgrade to version 9.5.3, 9.4.12, 9.3.15, 9.2.19 and 8.5.26 to receive a fix. | ||||
| CVE-2023-1387 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 2 Grafana, Ceph Storage | 2025-02-13 | 4.2 Medium |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Starting with the 9.1 branch, Grafana introduced the ability to search for a JWT in the URL query parameter auth_token and use it as the authentication token. By enabling the "url_login" configuration option (disabled by default), a JWT might be sent to data sources. If an attacker has access to the data source, the leaked token could be used to authenticate to Grafana. | ||||
| CVE-2023-46136 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 4 Werkzeug, Ceph Storage, Openshift Ironic and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 8 High |
| Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. If an upload of a file that starts with CR or LF and then is followed by megabytes of data without these characters: all of these bytes are appended chunk by chunk into internal bytearray and lookup for boundary is performed on growing buffer. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. This vulnerability has been patched in version 3.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45142 | 2 Opentelemetry, Redhat | 7 Opentelemetry, Acm, Ceph Storage and 4 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| OpenTelemetry-Go Contrib is a collection of third-party packages for OpenTelemetry-Go. A handler wrapper out of the box adds labels `http.user_agent` and `http.method` that have unbound cardinality. It leads to the server's potential memory exhaustion when many malicious requests are sent to it. HTTP header User-Agent or HTTP method for requests can be easily set by an attacker to be random and long. The library internally uses `httpconv.ServerRequest` that records every value for HTTP `method` and `User-Agent`. In order to be affected, a program has to use the `otelhttp.NewHandler` wrapper and not filter any unknown HTTP methods or User agents on the level of CDN, LB, previous middleware, etc. Version 0.44.0 fixed this issue when the values collected for attribute `http.request.method` were changed to be restricted to a set of well-known values and other high cardinality attributes were removed. As a workaround to stop being affected, `otelhttp.WithFilter()` can be used, but it requires manual careful configuration to not log certain requests entirely. For convenience and safe usage of this library, it should by default mark with the label `unknown` non-standard HTTP methods and User agents to show that such requests were made but do not increase cardinality. In case someone wants to stay with the current behavior, library API should allow to enable it. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39325 | 4 Fedoraproject, Golang, Netapp and 1 more | 53 Fedora, Go, Http2 and 50 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| A malicious HTTP/2 client which rapidly creates requests and immediately resets them can cause excessive server resource consumption. While the total number of requests is bounded by the http2.Server.MaxConcurrentStreams setting, resetting an in-progress request allows the attacker to create a new request while the existing one is still executing. With the fix applied, HTTP/2 servers now bound the number of simultaneously executing handler goroutines to the stream concurrency limit (MaxConcurrentStreams). New requests arriving when at the limit (which can only happen after the client has reset an existing, in-flight request) will be queued until a handler exits. If the request queue grows too large, the server will terminate the connection. This issue is also fixed in golang.org/x/net/http2 for users manually configuring HTTP/2. The default stream concurrency limit is 250 streams (requests) per HTTP/2 connection. This value may be adjusted using the golang.org/x/net/http2 package; see the Server.MaxConcurrentStreams setting and the ConfigureServer function. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29402 | 3 Fedoraproject, Golang, Redhat | 5 Fedora, Go, Ceph Storage and 2 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| The go command may generate unexpected code at build time when using cgo. This may result in unexpected behavior when running a go program which uses cgo. This may occur when running an untrusted module which contains directories with newline characters in their names. Modules which are retrieved using the go command, i.e. via "go get", are not affected (modules retrieved using GOPATH-mode, i.e. GO111MODULE=off, may be affected). | ||||