Total
4489 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-60554 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 3 Dir-600l, Dir-600l, Dir-600l Firmware | 2025-10-28 | 9.8 Critical |
| D-Link DIR600L Ax FW116WWb01 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the curTime parameter in the function formSetEnableWizard. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12240 | 1 Totolink | 2 A3300r, A3300r Firmware | 2025-10-27 | 8.8 High |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in TOTOLINK A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_B20221024. This affects the function setDmzCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. The manipulation of the argument ip leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12239 | 1 Totolink | 2 A3300r, A3300r Firmware | 2025-10-27 | 8.8 High |
| A weakness has been identified in TOTOLINK A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_B20221024. The impacted element is the function setDdnsCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Executing manipulation can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33010 | 1 Zyxel | 46 Atp100, Atp100 Firmware, Atp100w and 43 more | 2025-10-27 | 9.8 Critical |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in the ID processing function in Zyxel ATP series firmware versions 4.32 through 5.36 Patch 1, USG FLEX series firmware versions 4.50 through 5.36 Patch 1, USG FLEX 50(W) firmware versions 4.25 through 5.36 Patch 1, USG20(W)-VPN firmware versions 4.25 through 5.36 Patch 1, VPN series firmware versions 4.30 through 5.36 Patch 1, ZyWALL/USG series firmware versions 4.25 through 4.73 Patch 1, could allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause denial-of-service (DoS) conditions and even a remote code execution on an affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60339 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ac6, Ac6 Firmware | 2025-10-27 | 7.5 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the openSchedWifi function of Tenda AC6 v.15.03.06.50 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via injecting a crafted payload into the schedStartTime and schedEndTime parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60337 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ac6, Ac6 Firmware | 2025-10-27 | 7.5 High |
| Tenda AC6 V2.0 15.03.06.50 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the speed_dir parameter in the SetSpeedWan function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29246 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Usbx | 2025-10-27 | 9.8 Critical |
| Azure RTOS USBX is a USB host, device, and on-the-go (OTG) embedded stack. Prior to version 6.1.11, he USBX DFU UPLOAD functionality may be utilized to introduce a buffer overflow resulting in overwrite of memory contents. In particular cases this may allow an attacker to bypass security features or execute arbitrary code. The implementation of `ux_device_class_dfu_control_request` function does not assure that a buffer overflow will not occur during handling of the DFU UPLOAD command. When an attacker issues the `UX_SLAVE_CLASS_DFU_COMMAND_UPLOAD` control transfer request with `wLenght` larger than the buffer size (`UX_SLAVE_REQUEST_CONTROL_MAX_LENGTH`, 256 bytes), depending on the actual implementation of `dfu -> ux_slave_class_dfu_read`, a buffer overflow may occur. In example `ux_slave_class_dfu_read` may read 4096 bytes (or more up to 65k) to a 256 byte buffer ultimately resulting in an overflow. Furthermore in case an attacker has some control over the read flash memory, this may result in execution of arbitrary code and platform compromise. A fix for this issue has been included in USBX release 6.1.11. As a workaround, align request and buffer size to assure that buffer boundaries are respected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29223 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Usbx | 2025-10-27 | 7.5 High |
| Azure RTOS USBX is a USB host, device, and on-the-go (OTG) embedded stack. In versions prior to 6.1.10, an attacker can cause a buffer overflow by providing the Azure RTOS USBX host stack a HUB descriptor with `bNbPorts` set to a value greater than `UX_MAX_TT` which defaults to 8. For a `bNbPorts` value of 255, the implementation of `ux_host_class_hub_descriptor_get` function will modify the contents of `hub` -> `ux_host_class_hub_device` -> `ux_device_hub_tt` array violating the end boundary by 255 - `UX_MAX_TT` items. The USB host stack needs to validate the number of ports reported by the hub, and if the value is larger than UX_MAX_TT, USB stack needs to reject the request. This fix has been included in USBX release 6.1.10. | ||||
| CVE-2020-15999 | 7 Debian, Fedoraproject, Freetype and 4 more | 10 Debian Linux, Fedora, Freetype and 7 more | 2025-10-24 | 9.6 Critical |
| Heap buffer overflow in Freetype in Google Chrome prior to 86.0.4240.111 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60343 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ac6, Ac6 Firmware | 2025-10-24 | 7.5 High |
| Multiple buffer overflows in the AdvSetMacMtuWan function of Tenda AC6 v.15.03.06.50 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via injecting a crafted payload into the wanMTU, wanSpeed, cloneType, mac, serviceName, serverName, wanMTU2, wanSpeed2, cloneType2, mac2, serviceName2, and serverName2 parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4889 | 1 Fabian | 1 Tourism Management System | 2025-10-23 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in code-projects Tourism Management System 1.0 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects the function AddUser of the component User Registration. The manipulation of the argument username/password leads to buffer overflow. Local access is required to approach this attack. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2021-30983 | 1 Apple | 2 Ipados, Iphone Os | 2025-10-23 | 7.8 High |
| A buffer overflow issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 15.2 and iPadOS 15.2. An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54456 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-10-23 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFS: Fix potential buffer overflowin nfs_sysfs_link_rpc_client() name is char[64] where the size of clnt->cl_program->name remains unknown. Invoking strcat() directly will also lead to potential buffer overflow. Change them to strscpy() and strncat() to fix potential issues. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25724 | 1 Rti | 2 Connext Dds Professional, Connext Professional | 2025-10-21 | 7.3 High |
| In RTI Connext Professional 5.3.1 through 6.1.0 before 6.1.1, a buffer overflow in XML parsing from Routing Service, Recording Service, Queuing Service, and Cloud Discovery Service allows attackers to execute code with the affected service's privileges, compromise the service's integrity, leak sensitive information, or crash the service. These attacks could be done via a remote malicious RTPS message; a compromised call with malicious parameters to the RTI_RoutingService_new, rti::recording::Service, RTI_QueuingService_new, or RTI_CDS_Service_new public APIs; or a compromised local file system containing a malicious XML file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49458 | 1 Zoom | 8 Meeting Software Development Kit, Rooms, Rooms Controller and 5 more | 2025-10-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| Buffer overflow in certain Zoom Workplace Clients may allow an authenticated user to conduct a denial of service via network access. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42757 | 1 Fortinet | 16 Fortiadc, Fortianalyzer, Fortiddos and 13 more | 2025-10-16 | 6.3 Medium |
| A buffer overflow [CWE-121] in the TFTP client library of FortiOS before 6.4.7 and FortiOS 7.0.0 through 7.0.2, may allow an authenticated local attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution via specially crafted command line arguments. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53681 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 2 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2025-10-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvmet: Don't overflow subsysnqn nvmet_root_discovery_nqn_store treats the subsysnqn string like a fixed size buffer, even though it is dynamically allocated to the size of the string. Create a new string with kstrndup instead of using the old buffer. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3845 | 1 Markparticle | 1 Webserver | 2025-10-15 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was found in markparticle WebServer up to 1.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Buffer::HasWritten of the file code/buffer/buffer.cpp. The manipulation of the argument writePos_ leads to buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52949 | 2 Iptraf-ng, Redhat | 2 Iptraf-ng, Enterprise Linux | 2025-10-14 | 7.5 High |
| iptraf-ng 1.2.1 has a stack-based buffer overflow. In src/ifaces.c, the strcpy function consistently fails to control the size, and it is consequently possible to overflow memory on the stack. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31895 | 1 Siemens | 104 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I801, Ruggedcom I802 and 101 more | 2025-10-14 | 8.1 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM i801 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM i802 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM i803 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM M2100 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM M2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM M969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RMC30 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RP110 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS1600 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS1600F (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS1600T (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS400 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS401 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416P (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < 5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS8000 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS8000A (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS8000H (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS8000T (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS900GP (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS910 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS910L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS910W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS920L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS920W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS930L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS930W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS940G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.5.4). The DHCP client in affected devices fails to properly sanitize incoming DHCP packets. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause memory to be overwritten, potentially allowing remote code execution. | ||||