Total
674 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-43521 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-04-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| A downgrade issue affecting Intel-based Mac computers was addressed with additional code-signing restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.3, macOS Tahoe 26.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43468 | 1 Apple | 3 Macos, Macos Sequoia, Macos Sonoma | 2026-04-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| A downgrade issue affecting Intel-based Mac computers was addressed with additional code-signing restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.2, macOS Sonoma 14.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.1. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43390 | 1 Apple | 2 Macos, Macos Sequoia | 2026-04-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| A downgrade issue affecting Intel-based Mac computers was addressed with additional code-signing restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.2, macOS Tahoe 26.1. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20699 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-04-02 | 6.2 Medium |
| A downgrade issue affecting Intel-based Mac computers was addressed with additional code-signing restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.5, macOS Sonoma 14.8.5, macOS Tahoe 26.3, macOS Tahoe 26.4. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43185 | 1 Apple | 2 Macos, Macos Sequoia | 2026-04-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| A downgrade issue was addressed with additional code-signing restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.6. An app may be able to access protected user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20997 | 1 Samsung | 1 Smart Switch | 2026-04-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Smart Switch prior to version 3.7.69.15 allows remote attackers to potentially bypass authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33026 | 2 0xjacky, Nginxui | 2 Nginx-ui, Nginx Ui | 2026-04-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. Prior to version 2.3.4, the nginx-ui backup restore mechanism allows attackers to tamper with encrypted backup archives and inject malicious configuration during restoration. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32974 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-01 | 8.6 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.12 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in Feishu webhook mode when only verificationToken is configured without encryptKey, allowing acceptance of forged events. Unauthenticated network attackers can inject forged Feishu events and trigger downstream tool execution by reaching the webhook endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52648 | 2 Hcl, Hcltech | 2 Aion, Aion | 2026-03-30 | 4.8 Medium |
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where offering images are not digitally signed. Lack of image signing may allow the use of unverified or tampered images, potentially leading to security risks such as integrity compromise or unintended behavior in the system | ||||
| CVE-2026-4600 | 2 Jsrsasign Project, Kjur | 2 Jsrsasign, Jsrsasign | 2026-03-25 | 7.4 High |
| Versions of the package jsrsasign before 11.1.1 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature via the DSA domain-parameter validation in KJUR.crypto.DSA.setPublic (and the related DSA/X509 verification flow in src/dsa-2.0.js). An attacker can forge DSA signatures or X.509 certificates that X509.verifySignature() accepts by supplying malicious domain parameters such as g=1, y=1, and a fixed r=1, which make the verification equation true for any hash. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4115 | 1 Putty | 1 Putty | 2026-03-25 | 3.7 Low |
| A vulnerability was detected in PuTTY 0.83. Affected is the function eddsa_verify of the file crypto/ecc-ssh.c of the component Ed25519 Signature Handler. The manipulation results in improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack may be performed from remote. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit is now public and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The patch is identified as af996b5ec27ab79bae3882071b9d6acf16044549. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a patch for the affected product. However, at the moment there is no proof that this flaw might have any real-world impact. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27962 | 1 Authlib | 1 Authlib | 2026-03-24 | 9.1 Critical |
| Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.9, a JWK Header Injection vulnerability in authlib's JWS implementation allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge arbitrary JWT tokens that pass signature verification. When key=None is passed to any JWS deserialization function, the library extracts and uses the cryptographic key embedded in the attacker-controlled JWT jwk header field. An attacker can sign a token with their own private key, embed the matching public key in the header, and have the server accept the forged token as cryptographically valid — bypassing authentication and authorization entirely. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4258 | 1 Bitwiseshiftleft | 1 Sjcl | 2026-03-24 | 7.5 High |
| All versions of the package sjcl are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature due to missing point-on-curve validation in sjcl.ecc.basicKey.publicKey(). An attacker can recover a victim's ECDH private key by sending crafted off-curve public keys and observing ECDH outputs. The dhJavaEc() function directly returns the raw x-coordinate of the scalar multiplication result (no hashing), providing a plaintext oracle without requiring any decryption feedback. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3564 | 1 Connectwise | 1 Screenconnect | 2026-03-24 | 9 Critical |
| A condition in ScreenConnect may allow an actor with access to server-level cryptographic material used for authentication to obtain unauthorized access, including elevated privileges, in certain scenarios. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20989 | 2 Samsung, Samsung Mobile | 2 Android, Samsung Mobile Devices | 2026-03-23 | 2.4 Low |
| Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Font Settings prior to SMR Mar-2026 Release 1 allows physical attackers to use custom font. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3562 | 1 Phillips | 1 Hue Bridge | 2026-03-23 | N/A |
| Philips Hue Bridge hk_hap Ed25519 Signature Verification Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the ed25519_sign_open function. The issue results from improper verification of a cryptographic signature. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the system. Was ZDI-CAN-28480. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32597 | 2 Jpadilla, Pyjwt Project | 2 Pyjwt, Pyjwt | 2026-03-23 | 7.5 High |
| PyJWT is a JSON Web Token implementation in Python. Prior to 2.12.0, PyJWT does not validate the crit (Critical) Header Parameter defined in RFC 7515 §4.1.11. When a JWS token contains a crit array listing extensions that PyJWT does not understand, the library accepts the token instead of rejecting it. This violates the MUST requirement in the RFC. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.12.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4478 | 1 Yitechnology | 1 Yi Home Camera | 2026-03-20 | 8.1 High |
| A vulnerability was identified in Yi Technology YI Home Camera 2 2.1.1_20171024151200. This impacts an unknown function of the file home/web/ipc of the component HTTP Firmware Update Handler. The manipulation leads to improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is said to be difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59718 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortios, Fortiproxy, Fortiswitchmanager | 2026-03-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| A improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiOS 7.0.0 through 7.0.17, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.14, FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.21, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.5 allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass the FortiCloud SSO login authentication via a crafted SAML response message. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59719 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-03-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.9 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass the FortiCloud SSO login authentication via a crafted SAML response message. | ||||