Filtered by vendor Geovision Inc.
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211
Subscriptions
Total
24 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-88290 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.14 (260903) allows unauthenticated clients to declare unbounded VLSVR frame lengths and indefinitely delay blocking receives, allowing remote exhaustion of memory, connection, and worker resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88289 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.14 (260903) fails to validate attacker-controlled variable-length fields before copying them into fixed-size stack buffers in multiple VLSVR request handlers, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the VLSVR service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88288 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 fails to restrict the filename supplied to BKDownloadLink.cgi, allowing a remote user with valid web credentials to read arbitrary files accessible to the root-run web service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88287 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 fails to bound the number of Scopes tokens in unauthenticated ONVIF WS-Discovery Probe requests, allowing a remote attacker to corrupt stack control state and crash the discovery process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88286 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 improperly manages PTZ connection state, allowing an unauthenticated remote client to block the accept loop and prevent new PTZ connections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88285 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 9.4 Critical |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 exposes a network-accessible PTZ control service without authentication, allowing remote clients to retrieve PTZ information and issue PTZ or raw serial commands. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88283 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 4.9 Medium |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 fails to limit repeated User elements in ONVIF CreateUsers requests, allowing an authenticated administrator to overwrite stack control state and crash the ONVIF worker. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88281 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 4.9 Medium |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 fails to limit repeated Username elements in ONVIF DeleteUsers requests, allowing an authenticated administrator to overflow a stack array and crash the ONVIF worker. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88280 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 4.9 Medium |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 copies an oversized ONVIF SetUser password into a fixed stack field, allowing an authenticated administrator to crash the ONVIF worker. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88279 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 4.9 Medium |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 copies oversized ONVIF CreateUsers username or password values into fixed stack fields, allowing an authenticated administrator to crash the ONVIF worker. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88275 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 7.2 High |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 allows an administrator-controlled WPA-PSK containing shell syntax to execute arbitrary commands as root when wireless configuration is applied. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88274 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 7.2 High |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 allows an administrator-controlled wireless SSID containing shell syntax to execute arbitrary commands as root. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88273 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 7.2 High |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 allows an administrator-controlled PPPoE username to escape a sourced shell configuration assignment and execute arbitrary commands as root. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88272 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 7.2 High |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 allows an administrator-controlled username containing shell metacharacters to be executed as arbitrary root commands when the stored username is later deleted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88271 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 allows a Guest user to overwrite device configuration and replace the administrator password through SSVR. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88270 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 allows a Guest user to enter SSVR firmware-upgrade mode and disrupt live services before any firmware image is validated. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88269 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 1 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211 | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 allows a Guest user to retrieve persistent device configuration containing plaintext administrative and user credentials through SSVR. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57872 | 1 Geovision Inc. | 2 Gv-lpc2011 Lpc2211, Gv-lpclpc2011 2211 | 2026-06-29 | 7.5 High |
| An unauthenticated directory traversal vulnerability exists in get_fcont.cgi in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of user-supplied file path input before the requested file is accessed by the CGI component. A remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to read arbitrary files accessible to the affected process, resulting in information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42368 | 2 Geovision, Geovision Inc. | 5 Gv-lpc2011, Gv-lpc2011 Firmware, Gv-lpc2211 and 2 more | 2026-06-15 | 9.9 Critical |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Web Interface functionality of GeoVision LPC2011/LPC2211 1.10. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to execute priviledged operation. An attacker can visit a webpage to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42367 | 2 Geovision, Geovision Inc. | 5 Gv-lpc2011, Gv-lpc2011 Firmware, Gv-lpc2211 and 2 more | 2026-06-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Web Interface / ssi.cgi functionality of GeoVision LPC2011/LPC2211 1.10. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to credentials leak. An attacker can visit a webpage to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||