Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Logging
Subscriptions
Total
141 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-0874 | 1 Redhat | 3 Acm, Logging, Openshift | 2026-04-18 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in coredns. This issue could lead to invalid cache entries returning due to incorrectly implemented caching. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12085 | 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more | 29 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 26 more | 2026-04-18 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in rsync which could be triggered when rsync compares file checksums. This flaw allows an attacker to manipulate the checksum length (s2length) to cause a comparison between a checksum and uninitialized memory and leak one byte of uninitialized stack data at a time. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5037 | 1 Redhat | 4 Logging, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform and 1 more | 2026-04-18 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in OpenShift's Telemeter. If certain conditions are in place, an attacker can use a forged token to bypass the issue ("iss") check during JSON web token (JWT) authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11831 | 1 Redhat | 34 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform and 31 more | 2026-04-17 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in npm-serialize-javascript. The vulnerability occurs because the serialize-javascript module does not properly sanitize certain inputs, such as regex or other JavaScript object types, allowing an attacker to inject malicious code. This code could be executed when deserialized by a web browser, causing Cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. This issue is critical in environments where serialized data is sent to web clients, potentially compromising the security of the website or web application using this package. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0810 | 2 Gitoxidelabs, Redhat | 3 Gix-date, Enterprise Linux, Logging | 2026-04-16 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in gix-date. The `gix_date::parse::TimeBuf::as_str` function can generate strings containing invalid non-UTF8 characters. This issue violates the internal safety invariants of the `TimeBuf` component, leading to undefined behavior when these malformed strings are subsequently processed. This could potentially result in application instability or other unforeseen consequences. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28120 | 1 Redhat | 1 Logging | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| There is a vulnerability in ActiveSupport if the new bytesplice method is called on a SafeBuffer with untrusted user input. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45289 | 1 Redhat | 12 Advanced Cluster Security, Enterprise Linux, Logging and 9 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| When following an HTTP redirect to a domain which is not a subdomain match or exact match of the initial domain, an http.Client does not forward sensitive headers such as "Authorization" or "Cookie". For example, a redirect from foo.com to www.foo.com will forward the Authorization header, but a redirect to bar.com will not. A maliciously crafted HTTP redirect could cause sensitive headers to be unexpectedly forwarded. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34156 | 2 Go Standard Library, Redhat | 19 Encoding\/gob, Advanced Cluster Security, Ceph Storage and 16 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Calling Decoder.Decode on a message which contains deeply nested structures can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. This is a follow-up to CVE-2022-30635. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24791 | 2 Go Standard Library, Redhat | 20 Net\/http, Amq Streams, Ceph Storage and 17 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| The net/http HTTP/1.1 client mishandled the case where a server responds to a request with an "Expect: 100-continue" header with a non-informational (200 or higher) status. This mishandling could leave a client connection in an invalid state, where the next request sent on the connection will fail. An attacker sending a request to a net/http/httputil.ReverseProxy proxy can exploit this mishandling to cause a denial of service by sending "Expect: 100-continue" requests which elicit a non-informational response from the backend. Each such request leaves the proxy with an invalid connection, and causes one subsequent request using that connection to fail. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45296 | 2 Pillarjs, Redhat | 19 Path-to-regexp, Acm, Ansible Automation Platform and 16 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| path-to-regexp turns path strings into a regular expressions. In certain cases, path-to-regexp will output a regular expression that can be exploited to cause poor performance. Because JavaScript is single threaded and regex matching runs on the main thread, poor performance will block the event loop and lead to a DoS. The bad regular expression is generated any time you have two parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (.). For users of 0.1, upgrade to 0.1.10. All other users should upgrade to 8.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45338 | 1 Redhat | 27 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Ceph Storage and 24 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34158 | 2 Go Build Constraint, Redhat | 11 Go Standard Library, Cryostat, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Calling Parse on a "// +build" build tag line with deeply nested expressions can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45288 | 3 Go Standard Library, Golang, Redhat | 33 Net\/http, Http2, Acm and 30 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| An attacker may cause an HTTP/2 endpoint to read arbitrary amounts of header data by sending an excessive number of CONTINUATION frames. Maintaining HPACK state requires parsing and processing all HEADERS and CONTINUATION frames on a connection. When a request's headers exceed MaxHeaderBytes, no memory is allocated to store the excess headers, but they are still parsed. This permits an attacker to cause an HTTP/2 endpoint to read arbitrary amounts of header data, all associated with a request which is going to be rejected. These headers can include Huffman-encoded data which is significantly more expensive for the receiver to decode than for an attacker to send. The fix sets a limit on the amount of excess header frames we will process before closing a connection. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34155 | 1 Redhat | 15 Ceph Storage, Cost Management, Cryostat and 12 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Calling any of the Parse functions on Go source code which contains deeply nested literals can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47220 | 2 Redhat, Ruby | 2 Logging, Webrick | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in the WEBrick toolkit through 1.8.1 for Ruby. It allows HTTP request smuggling by providing both a Content-Length header and a Transfer-Encoding header, e.g., "GET /admin HTTP/1.1\r\n" inside of a "POST /user HTTP/1.1\r\n" request. NOTE: the supplier's position is "Webrick should not be used in production." | ||||
| CVE-2023-45290 | 1 Redhat | 20 Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform, Ceph Storage and 17 more | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| When parsing a multipart form (either explicitly with Request.ParseMultipartForm or implicitly with Request.FormValue, Request.PostFormValue, or Request.FormFile), limits on the total size of the parsed form were not applied to the memory consumed while reading a single form line. This permits a maliciously crafted input containing very long lines to cause allocation of arbitrarily large amounts of memory, potentially leading to memory exhaustion. With fix, the ParseMultipartForm function now correctly limits the maximum size of form lines. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45336 | 1 Redhat | 8 Acm, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The HTTP client drops sensitive headers after following a cross-domain redirect. For example, a request to a.com/ containing an Authorization header which is redirected to b.com/ will not send that header to b.com. In the event that the client received a subsequent same-domain redirect, however, the sensitive headers would be restored. For example, a chain of redirects from a.com/, to b.com/1, and finally to b.com/2 would incorrectly send the Authorization header to b.com/2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12797 | 1 Redhat | 5 Discovery, Enterprise Linux, Logging and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a server may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because handshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode is set. Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be vulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not detected by clients. RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue only arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the server, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate chain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to fail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys, by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER. Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw public key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those that do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was introduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2. The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24783 | 1 Redhat | 23 Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform, Ceph Storage and 20 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| Verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate with an unknown public key algorithm will cause Certificate.Verify to panic. This affects all crypto/tls clients, and servers that set Config.ClientAuth to VerifyClientCertIfGiven or RequireAndVerifyClientCert. The default behavior is for TLS servers to not verify client certificates. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55565 | 1 Redhat | 11 Acm, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 8 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| nanoid (aka Nano ID) before 5.0.9 mishandles non-integer values. 3.3.8 is also a fixed version. | ||||