Total
2600 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-87025 | 2026-09-09 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87019 | 2026-09-09 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53639 | 2026-09-09 | N/A | ||
| Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, the `GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` and `PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` endpoints look up the payment request solely by the hash from the URL. No ownership check is performed against the authenticated customer or the underlying order. An attacker who obtains a payment request hash can read the payment request and, through the `payment` IRI in the response, recover the underlying order's `tokenValue` (which itself grants access to the full order, items, addresses, customer email, totals); and/or update the payment request payload (e.g. `target_path`, `after_path`). These fields are used by the front-end controller to redirect the user after the payment, so an attacker can flip them to an attacker-controlled URL and intercept the buyer. The hash is a UUID, so it has to be obtained out-of-band (logs, shared links, referrer headers, a co-located client), but once it is known no other credential is required, neither authentication nor knowledge of the order token. The creation endpoint `POST /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payment-requests` shares the same flaw: it resolves the target order solely from the `tokenValue` in the URL without verifying that the caller owns the order. The issue is fixed in versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6. As a workaround, add a query extension that filters the `GET` operation; decorate the `PUT` state provider, guard the `POST` creation endpoint with a command-bus middleware, and wire the services. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85037 | 2026-09-09 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Sunshine Photo Cart WordPress plugin before 3.7 does not validate that a client-supplied price identifier belongs to the item being purchased when it is added to the cart, allowing unauthenticated users to buy items at a lower price defined elsewhere on the site and complete an order at that price, resulting in financial loss for the site owner. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53769 | 1 Avo Hq | 1 Avo | 2026-09-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Avo is a framework to create admin panels for Ruby on Rails apps. From version 2.28.0 to before version 3.32.0, Avo's direct attachment upload endpoint lacks server-side upload authorization and bypasses the documented field-level upload policy methods such as upload_{FIELD_ID}?. An authenticated Avo user who can reach the Avo attachment upload endpoint can replace or add attachment content, including binary content, filename, and content-type metadata, on a resolved record even when both update? and upload_<field>? policies deny the operation. This primarily affects multi-role Avo Pro/Advanced-style deployments where non-administrator or restricted operator users can reach Avo and per-record or per-field operations are expected to be enforced by policies. This issue has been patched in version 3.32.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13146 | 2026-09-09 | 3.7 Low | ||
| The WP Travel WordPress plugin before 12.0.2 does not properly verify that the requester owns the booking targeted by its bank-deposit slip submission, allowing an unauthenticated attacker who knows the target customer's email address to change that customer's booking payment state and attach a file to it. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86408 | 2 Misp, Misp-project | 2 Misp, Misp | 2026-09-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Affected versions of MISP do not enforce parent-event visibility when serving cryptographic keys through CryptographicKeysController::view(). The vulnerable handler queried CryptographicKey directly using the supplied key ID and selected sensitive fields such as: * type * key_data * fingerprint but did not fetch or authorize the associated parent event first. The upstream commit explicitly states that cryptographicKeys/view could return a protected event’s signing key to any authenticated user. The fix adds parent_id and parent_type to the lookup and then enforces authorization through the associated event using fetchSimpleEvent($user, parent_id). If the parent is not an Event, access is limited to site administrators. Version affected: ≤2.5.45 | ||||
| CVE-2026-86451 | 2 Misp, Misp-project | 2 Misp, Misp | 2026-09-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| Affected versions of MISP allow authenticated users to retrieve object-reference records by UUID through EventGraphTool::get_reference_data() without first checking whether the requester is authorized to view the object the reference belongs to. The vulnerable code queried ObjectReference.uuid directly and returned the matching row whenever it existed. Because no parent-object ACL was applied, a user who knew or obtained a reference UUID could retrieve information associated with an object outside their normal access scope. The commit explicitly states that any object reference could be returned by UUID without authorizing its parent object. The fix retrieves the referenced object's object_id and calls fetchObjectSimple() with the current user. If the user cannot access that parent object, MISP now returns NotFoundException instead of exposing the reference. Version affected: ≤2.5.45 | ||||
| CVE-2026-86743 | 1 Snipeitapp | 1 Snipe-it | 2026-09-09 | 5 Medium |
| Snipe-IT versions before 8.7.0 fail to properly scope asset acceptance report queries by company, allowing authenticated reports.view users to read pending acceptances across all companies. Attackers can access the unaccepted_assets report page or CSV export to disclose cross-company inventory details and assignee names without per-row access validation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17627 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-09-09 | 4.9 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and inject messages into workflow history due to improper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19651 | 2 Ibm, Quarkus | 2 Enterprise Build Of Quarkus, Quarkus-spring-web | 2026-09-09 | 7.4 High |
| IBM Enterprise Build of Quarkus 3.27.1 through 3.27.5, and 3.33.1 through 3.33.3 could allow an attacker to bypass authorization by manipulating URL query parameters due to incorrect mapping of values to untrusted query string input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87809 | 1 B3log | 1 Siyuan | 2026-09-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Siyuan before v3.8.2 fails to apply publish-access filtering to embedded blocks before rendering in the /api/export/preview and /api/lute/copyStdMarkdown endpoints. Attackers with reader access can retrieve the full rendered content of private, hidden, or publish-disabled blocks by accessing public documents containing embed queries that select those blocks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78462 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Visual Studio Code | 2026-09-09 | 8.8 High |
| Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73320 | 1 Xenforo | 1 Xenforo | 2026-09-09 | 6.1 Medium |
| XenForo before 2.3.13 contains an unauthenticated information disclosure vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to retrieve private unfurl records by supplying predictable auto-increment primary key IDs to the unfurl endpoint. Attackers can enumerate or predict result IDs and query the endpoint without any session, user, or visibility checks to obtain rendered preview HTML, original URLs, and query strings from private conversations and other restricted content. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18620 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift Ai, Openshift Ai 3.3 | 2026-09-08 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Data Science Pipelines. A restricted user, or tenant, can exploit an improper authorization vulnerability in the setDefaultServiceAccount function. By specifying a more privileged ServiceAccount (SA) during a CreateRun request, an attacker can bypass authorization checks. This allows the tenant to run their containers with elevated privileges, potentially leading to the disclosure of sensitive information (secrets) and the ability to execute commands within other users' pods. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86191 | 2 B3log, Siyuan | 2 Siyuan, Siyuan | 2026-09-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| SiYuan versions before v3.8.2 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the getAttributeViewKeysByID endpoint that allows publish readers to enumerate private attribute view key definitions without verifying parent database visibility. Attackers can access the endpoint to retrieve complete key schemas including sensitive field names and relation definitions from hidden databases. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16310 | 2 Learndash, Wordpress | 2 Learndash, Wordpress | 2026-09-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| The MemberDash plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.5 via the 'id' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the password of any WordPress user, including administrators, by supplying an arbitrary user ID during registration, and take over their account without any notification sent to the victim. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81802 | 2 Magepeopleteam, Wordpress | 2 Wpevently, Wordpress | 2026-09-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in WpEvently <= 5.6.0 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86263 | 1 Sfturing | 1 Hosp Order | 2026-09-08 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was detected in sfturing hosp_order up to 627f426331da8086ce8fff2017d65b1ddef384f8. This impacts the function orderRecordsService.cancelOrder of the file ssm_pro/src/main/java/cn/sfturing/web/OrderController.java of the component Order Cancellation. The manipulation of the argument ID results in authorization bypass. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86111 | 2 Bookwyrm-social, Joinbookwyrm | 2 Bookwyrm, Bookwyrm | 2026-09-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| BookWyrm through 0.9.1 fails to validate user visibility permissions in the status edit endpoint, allowing authenticated attackers to read followers-only and direct-message reviews by enumerating sequential status IDs. Attackers can access the raw content of restricted statuses through the edit view, bypassing the privacy protections documented for these message types. | ||||